is this the real article that Harry was pressured to quit over because he wants to keep his credibility?
Of course it's not, or else why isn't he still working in PC world?
This is obviously an re-written/heavily edited version of it. Crawford is ONLY doing it to silence people. so, can you really blame it to be a little "not well thought-out"?
I truly admire what Harry did, it's the kind of personality that is desperately lacking in today's journalism. Not to mention his last name is almost legendary. (no pun intended)
This is the article from PC World that caused the hullabaloo last week. To me, it doesn't seem to say anything new, and doesn't even strike me as particularly well thought-out.