ChatGPT's New Skills Resident Evil 4 Remake Galaxy A54 5G Hands-On TikTok CEO Testifies Huawei's New Folding Phone How to Use Google's AI Chatbot Airlines and Family Seating Weigh Yourself Accurately
Want CNET to notify you of price drops and the latest stories?
No, thank you

Twitter rebuffs a Facebook poke?

Apparently, the social network really was trying to buy the microblogging service. But Twitter's investors and executives would rather come up with a business model first, AllThingsD reports.

Maybe it wasn't just egregious Valley gossip-baiting when Federated Media CEO John Battelle asked Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg earlier this month if his company was going to buy Twitter.

Kara Swisher of AllThingsD reported early Monday morning that actual acquisition talks held between the two companies have fallen through.

The deal would have been for $500 million in Facebook stock, Swisher wrote.

Facebook's not big on acquisitions. The only sizable purchase the company has made was of a start-up called Parakey, and that was really just a way to bring on board founder Blake Ross.

Twitter's a different story. The microblogging service competes directly with Facebook's own "status" feature, to the point where many Twitter users have configured their Facebook statuses to display their Twitter statuses. It's also, after Facebook, the most-hyped company to come out of the Bay Area in the past five years. (Sorry, Digg. You're in third.)

Now playing: Watch this: Daily Debrief: Twitter this--why do a Facebook deal?

The two also have a moderate connection: early Twitter investor Marc Andreessen sits on Facebook's board. Then again, that kind of six-degrees-of-separation factoid is commonplace in the Valley.

The problem with the proposed Facebook acquisition was that, according to Swisher, Twitter's executives and investors thought it would be better for the company to come up with its own business model rather than sell out this early--in spite of the fact that the recession is going to make it really tough for prerevenue companies.

Plus, in addition to the "typical concerns about integration and costs" (per Swisher), Twitter reportedly was concerned about what that "$500 million in stock" really meant, given that Facebook's paper valuation is significantly different than the $15 billion "preferred" valuation at which Microsoft invested $240 million last year.

And, honestly: Facebook's still trying to evolve its own business model (to put it lightly). In this economic climate, does it really want to be handing more than $500 million in stock for a company that, while hyped, has even murkier plans for profitability? Twitter CEO Evan Williams has alluded to paid business accounts, but we still haven't seen anything concrete.