Everything Google Just Announced Pixel 7 Pro Phone Pixel 7 Phone Pixel Watch iPhone 14 Plus Review Audible Deal Prime Day 2 Next Week Pizza Deals
Want CNET to notify you of price drops and the latest stories?
No, thank you

How the Kindle replaced my iPad...for book reading

Regardless of iBooks 2's multimedia upgrades, my taste in e-reading has turned back the clock to e-ink. Here's why.

Sarah Tew/CNET

There's a case to be made for convergence devices, and for merging every product down to just one. The iPad, in many ways, has been that device for me: I travel light, I read or watch movies or play games or surf the Web on it. It's a security blanket and a thin catchall.

Still...I bought a Kindle.

The $79, no-touch, ad-supported version caught my eye the moment it arrived at the CNET offices, actually. Light, compact, great battery life, and that screen. That e-ink screen, frankly, has fascinated me. I know so many people who fetishize e-ink, and others who simply pass it by for the glowing screens of their phones or iPads. I fell into the latter category. Yet, the more I read my digital books, the more I became aware of fatigue that began to worry me.

My eyesight's not great. In fact, it's horrible. I've never found a friend who has worse myopia (-9). I stare at screens all day long. Going home as I walk. In the subway. At home. I'm a screen addict. Part of my attraction to the Kindle was its no-refresh, natural feeling, and the lack of pixel blur on full-page text. Maybe the iPad 3's possibly increased screen resolution might make text crisper for e-books, but I'm often painfully aware of the slight fuzz when reading on my iPad 2 using most fonts, and the subtle tricks it plays on my focus.

Here's my second case (or justification) for buying a cheap Kindle: mental focus.

Sarah Tew/CNET

My all-in-one convergence iPad is a distraction machine. I'm a jittery mess. On a plane, I read a few pages, then play half a board game, then watch some of a TV show, then flip through an e-magazine, then read some more. Sure, that probably makes me borderline ADD. My lack of focus isn't the iPad's problem. However, I admire the single-use intent of a book. A Kindle comes closest to that goal. Web browsing and other tasks are annoying, especially with the entry-level Kindle. That's why I picked it: it's a book-only device.

I also like the one-handed reading and jacket-pocketable aspects. On a subway, that's a big help. The Kindle's also less likely to be stolen during a commute.

My good friend who lives close to me suggested another purpose: he just bought a Kindle and recommended that we engage in a seasonal Kindle Swap, where we borrow each other's device to read a book. I'm not sure how that will pan out, but I feel fine lending a $79 device to a friend. An iPad, less so.

I followed many of my fellow CNET editors who are proud Kindle owners and made the plunge. I haven't regretted the purchase.

While Apple's been focusing on merging media with books via iBooks 2 and the iPad, I'm starting to find myself moving in the opposite direction: basic text, no colors. I might read comics or flip through magazines on the iPad, but when I'm digging into a 1,000-page novel, I'd prefer a Kindle.

Do we carry too many gadgets? I probably do. It's already somewhat silly to own an iPad and an iPhone. To also have a Kindle? Some might say it's absurd. I will say that my reading speed has boosted since buying mine a few weeks ago. New-gadget first love? Maybe, but I have a feeling that my single-purpose Kindle will be a bedside standby for a long while. By only reading a book, I'm making a decision to not check email or browse the Web, if only for a little while. And I could do with more moments like those.

What does this mean? Well, I probably buy too many gadgets, at least. I still love my iPad 2, and I use it nearly every day. But I think there's a place for single-purpose devices, if those single purposes are ones we care enough about. Sooner or later, Kindle-type e-ink readers might approach the price of a standard hardcover--and then, we won't have to decide at all.