If you have the money, and you want a 65-inch TV, you should buy the LG 65EF950T. It has the best picture of any TV I've tested so far, and it's flat. For that reason alone I like it better than its curved counterpart, the, which costs the same.
The longer version? Maybe you have the money and like curved TVs. Because, let's face it,than anything else. Fine, get the 65EG960T curved TV. Maybe you want a 55-inch TV instead. I'm not rich, so I'd pick the or, when it sells out, its basically identical replacement, the . Both are quite a bit cheaper than the 55EF950T but lose that model's next-generation chops, namely and . Of course, if you have the money and want those future-ready extras, go for it.
In Australia the EF950T has just hit the market in February 2016, costing AU$8,999 for 65-inches and AU$5,499 for 55-inches, which is identical pricing for the same size versions of the EG960T curved models.
Every inscrutable model number I just reeled off is attached to an. Because it's so difficult to produce, only LG manufactures OLED TVs today. OLED has the best image quality of any display technology we've tested. That includes all LED LCDs, such as Samsung's despite the fact that some of those TVs can get brighter, or use .
All of these OLED TVs are still exceedingly expensive, and even thoughare making the technology more affordable, it'll be at least another year before OLED competes against LED LCD on price. For some people, its advantages might be worth the money today, but for most of us, the price is still too steep. Then there's the fact that LED LCD sets come in a much wider range of sizes than OLED -- if you want something smaller than 55 or bigger than 65, it doesn't exist or it .
But if you're shopping for a high-end TV in one of those two sizes, and want the best picture you can get, skip all those expensive flagship LED LCDs and go with the O.
I performed a hands-on evaluation of the 65-inch LG 65EF9500, but this review also applies to the 55-inch LG 55EF9500. Both sizes have identical specifications, and according to the manufacturer, should provide very similar picture quality. They are identical to the EF950T series available in Australia.
Even with the picture off, the EF950T looks great. It has the same vanishingly narrow border around the screen as its curved linemate which, at 0.4 inch wide, makes the TV seem all screen. The curved version does feel more futuristic, but a flat TV sure looks better when mounted on a wall.
A sliver of silver around the rim is visible from the front, and the only other adornment to the TV itself is the illuminated LG logo set into a mirrored semicircle on the bottom. You can dim it or turn it off completely, and if you reach behind the logo you'll find a little joystick that provides volume and input control, as well as menu access.
The trademark thinness of OLED is only enhanced by the flat form factor. The top half of the TV measures 0.25 inch (6.35mm) thick -- pretty amazing, but still not quite as slim asat 0.2 inch. As usual, the need to house electronics, a power supply and inputs necessitates a thicker bulge, so the bottom half of the EF950T widens to about 2 inches. Sans stand, the 65-incher weighs a feathery 46.7 pounds (21kg), while the 55-incher tips the scales at an even 30 (13.5kg).
Just like the curved version, you'll need to buy a special bracket, model OTW150 ($99), to wall-mount the EF950T. Unlike most TVs, it doesn't work with standard VESA mounting kits.
Otherwise you'll use the included stand, a solid-feeling affair with a silver base and a transparent chunk of acrylic to support the TV itself. The overall effect is pleasingly "floaty" but lacks the beautiful organic sweep of the 55EC930T. For whatever reason, LG decided to color the back and the nondetachable power cord white.
The latest version of LG's Magic Remote is bigger and better than its predecessors, and I prefer it overall to Samsung's 2015 clicker. It's medium as opposed to small, and its motion control felt more precise than ever in my hand. The system was very responsive, and as usual, I really loved having a scroll wheel for blowing through lists or quickly scanning Web pages. There are a lot more buttons than before, including a numeric keypad and a much-appreciated settings key, so the lack of illumination is annoying. I also don't love the layout -- in particular, I kept hitting "3D" when I wanted settings -- but overall it's very good.
|Smart TV:||Web OS 2.0|
|3D glasses included:||2 pair|
OLED is much closer to thethan to the LED LCD ( ) technology used in the vast majority of today's TVs. Where LCD relies on a backlight shining through a liquid crystal panel to create the picture, with OLED and plasma, each individual sub-pixel is responsible for creating illumination. That's why OLED and plasma are known as "emissive" and LED LCD as "transmissive" displays, and a big reason why OLED's picture quality is so good.
For picture-quality buffs, OLED is the ultimate display technology, but it's not perfect. In addition toof brightness reduction over time (LG claims a 30,000-hour lifespan, for what it's worth), OLED is more subject to than LED LCD. The manual reads: "If a fixed image displays on the TV for a long period of time, it will...become a permanent disfigurement on the screen. This...burn-in is not covered by the warranty." It advises owners to avoid displaying 4:3 aspect ratio images and other fixed images for longer than an hour at a time.
I didn't actually "test" burn-in in my review sample, but I did notice some temporary retention with test patterns. That said, it didn't seem to retain static images as badly as plasmas I've tested in the past. Just like with plasma, under normal use conditions, I wouldn't worry about burn-in with OLED.
We've written plenty more about OLED in the past, so I won't rehash it all here. Check out the links at the left if you're interested in further details.
Aside from its display technology, the other major feature is 4K resolution. LG told CNET it's, going all-in with 4K. The higher resolution adds cost -- significantly more so than on an LCD TV -- and a 65-inch 1,080p OLED would surely please videophiles who don't own private islands, but for now, the 65EF950T and 65EG960T are the least expensive 65-inch OLED TVs.
The visible benefits of 4K resolution big improvement with passive 3D. LG includes two pairs of passive glasses with the 65EF950T, which seems a bit stingy for a TV this expensive.with 2D material, but they do provide a
HDR and wide colour gamut: Among high-end TVs this year one big differentiator is whether the set is capable of displaying next-generation content, for example 4K Blu-ray, that utilizesand/or a .
Unlike the curved EG960T series, the flat EF950T is fully HDR-compliant. That doesn't mean it gets any brighter than its curved brother -- we'll have to wait till 2016 at least before we see a-- but it does mean that it can accept HDR signals from HDMI-equipped source devices like . The EG960T does not have this capability, in part because it's HDMI inputs are not upgradeable to .
Both series do share the ability to stream HDR sources from the Internet, however. Amazon currently offers select titles in HDR, and Netflix has said it will launch its own HDR titles sometime this year.
As for wide color gamut, the EF950T does fairly well. According to my measurements of the Wide colour space, it's capable of delivering 87.7 percent of DCI/P3 color, thought to be the successor to the high-def colour space. That's a bit less than theand (both about 91 percent of P3), but closer than I would have thought given . See below for more on the EF950T's color.
Smart TV: Equipped with LG's newest iteration of, the 65EF950T delivers a very good smart TV experience. I prefer it to Samsung's 2015 Tizen system overall, as well as to (available on Sony and Sharp 2015 sets). Web OS is simpler and more intuitive to use than those others, yet still maintains a degree of sophistication and customizability. Of course, is still my favorite Smart TV system.
The biggest improvement over the original version of Web OS is speed. The new interface is markedly snappier, even with the menus' bouncy happy animations, and I had no complaints about responsiveness, even in the deep settings menus. It's worth mentioning that owners of LG's 2014 sets will get anto version 2.0, although their TVs won't be quite as responsive as true 2015 models.
Otherwise, little has changed. Motion control is available in all of the menus and many of the apps, making it relatively easy to select items. I also appreciated the unique screen capture function. Hitting the Home button on the remote brings up a band of diagonally aligned "cards," overlaying the lower third of whatever program or app you're watching at the moment. Other systems take a similar approach, but LG's icon band is both prettier and friendlier.
Unlike with Android TV and Tizen, which only show the most recent apps, you can customize and reorder the main interface to populate it with your favorite apps. Netflix and Pandora get cards, of course, but HDMI 1 and 2 do as well, along with the Web browser and local media available from USB or DLNA (WebOS also supports Plex). Click to the left of the main band and a history of the last few apps and other functions used appears. To the right reside the additional apps and functions you can launch and/or add to the main band in the middle.
The updated "LG Content Store" is much better-organized than before, with categories for movies, TV shows 3D, apps and games, and "premium" apps. Choosing a movie or TV show and hitting "watch now" shows you a list of services that offer it,. The myriad other apps are categorized, but unfortunately not searchable.
The system has most major apps but Android, Samsung and Roku all offer a wider selection. The Web browser is decent, and the motion remote greatly eases navigation and typing with the onscreen keyboard easier. Still, you'll want to use your phone, tablet or PC browser first.
Voice search seems as accurate as most such systems, but if you're like me you'll abandon it after a few failures at recognition, which are inevitable. A "Dora the Explorer" search I tried (for my daughters, I swear!) only showed me one episode immediately, and I had to hit the obscurely named "Detail Info" button to see more options, which appeared on a poorly designed page with episode numbers instead of easily accessible descriptions. Once again, Roku's universal search wins handily, and Android TV is better, too.
4K streaming apps: I checked out 4K streaming on the built-in Netflix and Amazon apps, and they worked as expected -- and Amazon seems to have improved to the point where it almost instantly gave me the highest-quality version. (Amazon, of course, won't be available to the Australian audience). As usual, I didn't see a massive image quality improvement over those services' HD streams, and in previous tests I've performed, neither 4K streaming services' image quality could quite match the best 1080p Blu-rays. And of course content is scarce, although both services have added numerous 4K titles, in particular original series. Unlike Samsung and Vizio, LG.
Amazon's app also allows you to watch the HDR titles on the EF950T. I'll cover them more in-depth in the picture quality section below, but in the meantime, it's worth mentioning that I appreciated the little "HDR is now on" bug that appeared whenever I started streaming an HDR title.
New for this year, LG's YouTube app is capable of delivering videos in 4K resolution. Unfortunately the app -- unlike the YouTube website or the app on Samsung's 2015 4K TVs -- doesn't indicate what resolution the video is streaming in, so it's tough to know what you're really watching. I checked out a few of the 4K videos there, including "Honey Bees" and "Beauty of Nature," and they looked sharp enough.
I also tried a quick experiment using Florian Fredrich's 4K resolution pattern. Streaming via LG's YouTube app it delivered the full resolution of 4K, which is better than I saw on the Nvidia Shield's 4K YouTube app. Samsung's JS9500 delivered the full resolution via streaming too, although lesser Samsungs I've tested, and LG's EG960T curved OLED TV, did not. It's tough to pin down exactly why these differences occurred, but just remember that streaming mileage, even with 4K, will vary.
Picture settings: LG offers plenty of presets and lots of tweaks for calibrators, particularly in the Expert 1 and Expert 2 settings banks. The main determinant of light output is an OLED LIGHT setting, similar to a backlight control on an LCD TV. The set also offers a few dejudder/smoothing presets and a custom mode that allows you to dial in as much or as little blur and/or soap opera effect as you desire. Two-point and 20-point grayscale, a full color management system and selectable gamma (including BT.1886) round out the calibrators' toolbox.
It's worth mentioning that the HDR source I tested, namely the Amazon app, grayed out the picture settings and made it impossible to adjust any of them. On Samsung's HDR-capable sets, it was possible to make some picture adjustments. See the HDR testing section below for more.
Connectivity: I was disappointed to see only three HDMI inputs on the white backside of the 65EF9500 when most medium- and high-end TVs today have at least four. It's not a deal-breaker by any means, but in my opinion a TV this expensive should have at least four HDMI inputs. At least they're all equipped with(technically they're HDMI 2.0a) and .
There's also a setting called Ultra HD Deep Colour. It allows HDMI inputs 1 and 2 to accept 4K/60 signals at 4:4:4 and 4:2:2 chroma subsampling rates, and 10 bits. Sources with that level of color are very rare so I didn't test the feature for this review, but it could be useful in the future.
Other connections include three USB ports (one of which is version 3.0), an analog AV input with composite video, another with component-video; an optical digital audio output, an Ethernet jack, a headphone output and a RS-232 connection for custom installation systems.
If you've read any of my (or other reviewers') write-ups on OLED TVs before, you know what's coming in this section. This TV's unmatched contrast ratio is the main thing that makes it superior to today's LCD-based TVs, as well as to best the plasma TVs of yore. It's so important, in fact, that while LG's OLED falls a bit short of its current competition in a few other areas, its significantly superior contrast without the trade-offs of local dimming gives it a better picture overall.