Editors' note, June 8, 2017: At its, Apple unveiled a new . Starting at $649, £619 and A$949, the new model replaces the original , packing a bigger screen -- a 10.5-inch Retina display -- into a footprint similar to that of the cheaper, 9.7-inch, non-Pro model Apple debuted in March (reviewed below). The new 10.5-inch iPad Pro also comes equipped with a more powerful processor, higher-quality cameras, and, when it debuts in the fall, . These upgrades are also coming to the , which starts at $799, £679 or AU$1,249. The other two iPad models -- the iPad and -- remain a part of the lineup, unchanged since their earlier debuts.
Remember the iPad? In the afterglow of its splashy 2010 debut, Apple's tablet became the post-smartphone "it" gadget of the decade. In recent years, however, iPad Pro -- towards productivity and creativity features such as stylus support and a high-end keyboard.-- both for iPads and . But not for lack of trying: Near-annual improvements have pushed the iPad family forward, with higher-resolution retina screens, ever thinner bodies, and -- with the more expensive
Ironically, the iPad line's biggest problem was that the older models were so good that there wasn't a huge incentive to replace them. And it didn't help that phone screens have gotten ever larger in the past few years, too: Why lug out a tablet, even a slim one like an iPad, when a phones -- remained good enough for a lot of users.offers a reasonably close experience? Those newer iPad Pro models, meanwhile, were perfectly lustworthy, but priced at laptop pricing tiers of $600 and up. For watching videos, reading the web and playing , older iPads -- or those big-screen
That's why I'm surprised that I'm as excited as I am about this new 2017 model, a 9.7-inch tablet simply called iPad. Like the superthin 12-inch MacBook, it drops all the honorifics -- no Air, Pro or Mini here -- and instead positions itself as the most purely distilled example of the concept. Not the bells-and-whistles flagship, but the one that delivers the iPad basics at a very competitive cost.
The price, in fact, is the most exciting thing about this otherwise very familiar iPad. It starts at $329 for the 32GB Wi-Fi only model and goes up to $559 for 128GB of storage and 4G LTE cellular data, which is the model tested here. There is no 64GB option.
That starting price of $329 is $70 less than the $399 starting price of the iPad Air 2 it replaces. That's $60 more than the previous budget champ, the smaller iPad Mini 2 (now discontinued), but it still makes this new model the most affordable full-size iPad ever.
Apple iPad prices
||32GB Wi-Fi||128GB Wi-Fi||32GB LTE||128GB LTE|
Thanks to its lower starting price, this is a great first iPad for someone new to the brand, or an opportunity to update from an iPad Mini. It's close enough to impulse buy territory for a lot of people, and it's also a near-perfect gift for anyone., such as the third-gen retina iPad or the original
Apple iPad (9.7-inch, 2017)
|Price as reviewed||$559, £559 or AU$779|
|Display size/resolution||9.7-inch 2,048x1,536-pixel touchscreen|
|Networking||802.11ac wireless, Bluetooth 4.2, LTE|
|Operating system||iOS 10.3|
Let's call it the iPad SE
So how did Apple cut the price on a full-size iPad without cutting into their legendary profit margins? Well, let's just say that this new iPad may not actually be as new as it seems. It follows the half-step-forward, half-step-back model used in the and the iPhone SE ($369.00 at DWI Digital Cameras), essentially putting updated components in a bit of a throwback physical package, while keeping more expensive, more feature-filled models on sale right next to it.
This new iPad replaces the iPad Air 2 in Apple's tablet lineup, but it's actually closer to the original iPad Air in some ways. In fact, it has the exact same 7.5mm thickness and 469 gram weight as the 2013 iPad Air 1. By comparison, the Wi-Fi version of the iPad Air 2 is 6.1mm thick and weighs 437 grams (as does the 9.7-inch iPad Pro). Note that the LTE versions of these tablets weigh 7 to 9 grams more.
Even though this new model is slightly thicker and heavier, you'd probably have to put them side by side to notice. It's minor, but in person, there's a definite difference. It's a small step backwards in design, and it's probably also at least one reason this new tablet reverts back to the classic iPad name rather than the iPad Air.
Apple says new smart covers and related accessories for the iPad are backwards compatible with the original iPad Air line, but the reverse may not be true because of some shifting in where the magnets that control the sleep/wake feature are located.