CNET también está disponible en español.

Ir a español

Don't show this again

Bulked-up body


Flipping LCD

Typical modes

Not thrilled with the buttons


Two views


The A550 is heavier and bulkier than its lower-end brethren are--though it's lighter than the competition are--but oddly doesn't make as good use of space and is less streamlined for shooting. Like many dSLRs that have to remain backwardly compatible with older lenses, the A550 has a Manual/autofocus switch on the body that you confusingly have to remember to match with the switch on the lens.
Caption by / Photo by Sarah Tew/CNET
The navigation switch feels a bit too flat, without enough tactile feedback; I frequently ended up pressing the AF button while trying to navigate menus.
Caption by / Photo by Sarah Tew/CNET
While not as flexible a design as a flip-and-twist articulated LCD, Sony's tiltable displays are nice for shooting at odd angles.
Caption by / Photo by Sarah Tew/CNET
If the guide is turned on, when you rotate the mode dial a description of the mode appears on the LCD screen.
Caption by / Photo by Sarah Tew/CNET
On the lower-end models, Sony puts controls for the ISO sensitivity and drive modes on the navigation switch on the back of the camera. I think that placement works better than the three, hard-to-differentiate buttons on the top of this one. It's also annoying that in a camera of this class that you have to set the ISO sensitivity via the back display--it doesn't appear in the viewfinder. Usually on dSLRs with buttons on the top right, they're placed forward enough to easily and comfortably reach with your forefinger. On the A550, they're set closer to the camera back where you can't comfortably reach them with either your thumb or forefinger unless you lower the camera.
Caption by / Photo by Sarah Tew/CNET
Note how the LCD, when tucked in, extends beyond the viewfinder eyecup. That makes it relatively uncomfortable when trying to use the viewfinder. On the upside, the A550's grip is much better than that of its lower-end siblings; theirs are about 3/4 height, which feels much less secure.
Caption by / Photo by Sarah Tew/CNET
Compared with the standard display (bottom), the graphic display (top) is intended to provide an educational view of the relationship between shutter speed and aperture, as well as the effect each has on stopping action and depth of field. I think it's odd that the graphic display drops the metering mode info, however. It's also a bit frustrating that Sony, which pioneered the interactive display in the A700 (where hitting a button would let you navigate the bottom view and change settings), opts for the disruptive Fn-button-into-different-interface approach (see next slide).
Caption by / Photo by Sarah Tew/CNET
While I prefer the interactive displays that are becoming more common--there's less of a jarring transition between looking at the settings and adjusting them--Sony's traditional approach may seem less cramped for some shooters.
Caption by / Photo by Sarah Tew/CNEt
Up Next
Which Canon dSLR?