CNET también está disponible en español.

Ir a español

Don't show this again

Christmas Gift Guide
I don't recommend going about ISO 200 with the S600; the photos start out looking a bit overprocessed (though noise-free), but at ISO 400 you start to see noise and some smearing, and by ISO 800 the smaller details are almost completely broken down.
Caption by CNET Reviews staff / Photo by CNET Labs
The S600's in-camera D-Lighting post processing works pretty well for salvaging underexposed photos.
Caption by CNET Reviews staff / Photo by Lori Grunin
There's some visible barrel distortion at the S600's widest angle of view, but it's not bad given the 28mm-equivalent focal length, and certainly no worse than the distortion we see on 35mm-plus-equivalent snapshot cameras.
Caption by CNET Reviews staff / Photo by Lori Grunin
Although you can see some pretty bad fringing in this example, for the most part the S600 didn't display much of a problem, even on extremely blown-out edges. I'm not quite sure why this photo had issues while similar ones did not.
Caption by CNET Reviews staff / Photo by Lori Grunin
For a point-and-shoot, the S600 renders colors very well; they're saturated but relatively accurate.
Caption by CNET Reviews staff / Photo by Lori Grunin
The S600's images tend to be too soft, and the camera gives you no control over sharpness settings. Large prints look fine, though, as long as you don't plan to crop too closely or blow them up too big.
Caption by CNET Reviews staff / Photo by Lori Grunin
Like many snapshot cameras, the S600 seriously blows out highlights. Both metering schemes offered by the camera--evaluative and center-weighted--delivered identical exposures.
Caption by CNET Reviews staff / Photo by Lori Grunin
Updated:
Up Next
Sony A7R III photos and full-resolu...
15