Get the latest reports on events
in the landmark Oracle-DOJ trial
in our special section of coverage.
Oracle had sought to exclude the testimony of three university professors scheduled to take the stand next week on behalf of the Justice Department.
Marco Iansiti, a business professor from Harvard University; Ken Elzinga, a University of Virginia economics professor; and Preston McAfee, a business economics professor with the California Institute of Technology are all expected to address economic issues related to the merger, including the potential impact on market share, competition and pricing.
The Justice Department wanted to bar Dale Kutnick, a Meta Group analyst, from discussing the possible economic impact of an Oracle-PeopleSoft merger during his testimony. Kutnick has published a research note saying that Oracle is vulnerable to competitors and that an acquisition of PeopleSoft would bolster its position against major rivals, including IBM and Microsoft.
U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker's decision reflects a pattern to resist requests for special treatment for witnesses and evidence. Throughout the first week of the trial, Walker expressed disapproval of numerous requests to seal or black out portions of documents submitted as evidence in the trial. He issued Friday's decision via teleconference--federal courts were closed in observation of Ronald Reagan's funeral.
Over the next two weeks, the Justice Department is scheduled to call many big PeopleSoft customers and economists to the witness stand. Oracle then will make its case, with the trial expected to conclude in early July. The nonjury trial isabout four weeks, with the government presenting its case first. Oracle is expected to follow on or around July 2.