Reviewed on December 6, 2004Lexmark simplifies this easy-on-the-eyes multifunction so that it won't confuse you, but can you trade ease of use for quality?TAGS:Lexmark, printing, photograph, e-mail
Reviewed on May 16, 2008With so many other inexpensive photo inkjets on the market today, we can't recommend the Lexmark z2420--it's prone to paper jams, prints at a snail's pace, and produces unacceptable quality prints.TAGS:Lexmark, printer, IEEE 802.11, HP OfficeJet, photograph, networking, printing, HP
Reviewed on February 1, 2007For tight budgets where only the occasional printout is needed, the single-function Lexmark Z845 is a good choice. It can't match the feature sets, the print speeds, or the print quality of pricier models, but it's cheap and simple to operate.TAGS:Lexmark, cartridge, Canon Pixma, print, printer, printing, Canon Inc., photograph, HP
Reviewed on June 8, 2007The Lexmark Z1300 isn't for everyone, but, for users who want to spend the bare minimum for occasional prints, it's quite a bargain.TAGS:Lexmark, cartridge, printing, printer, photograph
Reviewed on November 14, 2002This printer is fast, cheap, and easy to use--too bad about its weak graphics print quality and high ink costs.TAGS:Lexmark, printing, printer
Reviewed on March 18, 2008All-in-one printers are a tough sell, and we must insist that manufacturers release machines that produce prints with the same standard of quality as their individual counterparts. With that in mind, we can't recommend the Lexmark x7550 because of its poor quality prints and several mechanical snags.TAGS:Lexmark, tray, paper, printing, fax, photograph, printer