13 Results for

wikipedians

Article

Wikipedians backlash against Search Engine Land article

Manipulating Wikipedia could land you in a world of hurt

By Jul. 2, 2007

Article

Wikipedia shutters 250 accounts in probe of paid edits

Online encyclopedia reveals it banned hundreds of accounts as part of an investigation into "suspicious edits and sockpuppetry" that promoted organizations or products.

By Oct. 21, 2013

Article

Corruption in Wikiland? Paid PR scandal erupts at Wikipedia

A Wikipedia trustee and a Wikipedian In Residence have been editing the online encyclopedia on behalf of PR clients. Add the discovery of an SEO business run on the side, and this tempest is out of its teapot.

By Sep. 18, 2012

Article

Wikipedia planning to survey its members to figure out why they post

Wikipedia contributors go under the microscope with an upcoming survey from the service's creators.

By Jan. 24, 2008

Article

Wikipedia honcho caught in scandal quits, defends paid edits

High-placed editors at Wikipedia's U.K. site were caught in a simmering paid-PR scandal. After news broke, one resignation and a little backpedaling has done little to solve the problem.

By Sep. 22, 2012

Article

Michael Jackson's death roils Wikipedia

Scores of users insert reports of Michael Jackson's death into entries about him in the online encyclopedia, which are deleted, re-inserted, and deleted again.

By Jun. 25, 2009

Article

Politicians notice Wikipedia

By Jan. 30, 2006

Article

The 404 388: Where there's a Tesla coil in the room

Somehow we make it past the wild Tesla coil in the room to bring you an awesome (if not kind of late) show! Today we show you how to self destruct your private data, discuss how 3D is totally lame, and why we think Jon Stewart should run for president.

By Jul. 23, 2009

Article

The 404 270: Where we better have a wiki page by the end of this show

The 404 is a big supporter of open-source information, so we invite our buddy Nic Hill, director of 'Truth in Numbers: the Wikipedia Story,' to shed some light on the site and its ongoing controversy.

By Feb. 2, 2009