12 Results for

vg278h

Review

Asus VG278H

The Asus VG278H has great 3D performance and a fast refresh rate, but is just a bit too expensive for what it offers.

By May. 17, 2012

3 stars Editor's rating May. 17, 2012
Gallery

The Asus VG278H basks in the overcast sky (photos)

CNET gets detail shots of the Asus VG278H in a sun-filled office.

8 Images By May. 17, 2012

Video

The Asus VG278H kills at 3D and not much else.

The Asus VG278H has great 3D performance, a fast fresh rate, but is just a bit too expensive for what it offers.

By May. 16, 2012

Article

Asus VG278H review: Great 3D, but what about that price?

The Asus VG278H is one of the best 3D monitors available, but can it overcome its plain and sometimes obtrusive design, as well as its high price?

By May. 17, 2012

Article

Nvidia 3D Vision 2 review: Great performance, slim availability

The Nvidia 3D Vision 2 solution is a combination of redesigned, more comfortable glasses and Lightboost technology. It's just unfortunate that so few Lightboost monitors exist.

By Jun. 17, 2012

Article

Best 3D gaming monitors

If you're interested at all in 3D gaming on the PC, you'll want to check out the best five monitors for just that purpose.

By May. 21, 2012

Review

HP Pavilion 27xi

As long as you have no advanced demands, the Pavilion 27xi will meet your basic needs with aplomb.

By Feb. 19, 2013

3.5 stars Editor's rating Feb. 19, 2013
Article

Nvidia 3D Vision 2 makes 3D twice as bright

Nvidia has lifted the curtain on its next generation of 3D PC products, and they promise to make your games brighter and more colourful.

By Oct. 15, 2011

Review

Nvidia 3D Vision 2 Wireless Glasses (Extra Pair)

Thanks to its bright images and minimal crosstalk, the Nvidia 3D Vision 2 glasses with Lightboost are the current best 3D solution for gaming and watching movies on the PC.

By Jun. 15, 2012

3.5 stars Editor's rating Jun. 15, 2012
Review

Samsung SyncMaster T27B750ND

The Samsung SyncMaster T27B750 offers a giant coffer's worth of features and sports a beautiful design, but its performance was underwhelming.

By Aug. 2, 2012

3.5 stars Editor's rating Aug. 2, 2012