The electronics titans square off in a tangled tale of mobile technology, centered on Apple's iPhone
Apple gets support from the Finnish phone maker in one of its many patent battles with Samsung.
U.K. Judge Robin Jacob is now employed by the same company that got his nod of approval in a case against Apple last year.
The company turns a legal requirement to publicly acknowledge defeat in its U.K. High Court patent case against Samsung into a new chance to say Samsung copied the iPad.
Unlike Apple's clear victory in the first Apple v. Samsung trial over patent infringement, this time around the jury returned a mixed verdict. CNET's Kara Tsuboi and Shara Tibken explain why the case was about more than money.
Apple and Samsung will have one hour each to present more testimony Monday, rather than wrap up evidence Friday, because of an appeals court ruling related to one of the patents at issue in the case.
Judge Lucy Koh earlier this week ruled not to institute a permanent injunction against Samsung for selling older-model smartphones found to infringe Apple patents.
Extending its accusation that iPhone owners are "wall-huggers," Samsung plans to advertise around power outlets at airports.
The decision by the USPTO, while relevant to the most recent Apple v. Samsung patent-infringement trial, isn't final and could take months or years to come to conclusion.
Samsung snagged 36.1 percent of smartphone shipments in the second quarter, compared with 29.7 percent for Apple, new data from Counterpoint Research shows.
The smartphone giants settled their patent suits outside the US. But that may mean they'll pay even more attention to Apple's home turf.