113 Results for

rl

Review

2011 Acura RL

With only moderate tech updates over the years, the 2011 Acura RL lags behind the cutting-edge competition, and has trouble justifying its over-$50K price.

By Mar. 23, 2011

3 stars Editor's rating Mar. 23, 2011
Review

2009 Acura RL

The 2009 Acura RL remains at the cutting edge in terms of features, and while not necessarily sporting, its performance and ride are very smooth. Interior electronics are due for at least a face-lift, however.

By Oct. 19, 2008

3.5 stars Editor's rating Oct. 19, 2008

Pricing not available

Video

2011 Acura RL

The most, um, "exclusive" car in its class.

By Mar. 25, 2011

Gallery

2011 Acura RL (photos)

Minor updates to the Acura RL over the years have not helped it keep up with the latest in tech. In fact, Acura has given its other models better updates. Why so little love for the RL?

19 Images By Mar. 24, 2011

Article

Acura RL updates come slowly

CNET Car Tech reviews the 2011 Acura RL.

By Mar. 25, 2011

Review

2007 Acura RL

You won't notice the 2007 Acura RL's shortcomings if you don't push it hard, and its cabin gadgets are very easy to use. If it weren't for the mediocre fuel economy, the RL would be a very good high-tech commute car.

By Jun. 26, 2007

3.5 stars Editor's rating Jun. 26, 2007

Pricing not available

Article

CNET Car Tech: 2011 Acura RL

The most, um, "exclusive" car in its class.

By Apr. 2, 2011

Review

2006 Acura RL

Our criticisms of the 2006 Acura RL are minor compared to all it has to offer. It's marketed as a high-tech car and delivers on all fronts, from live traffic on its navigation screen to cutting-edge driving technology.

By Mar. 20, 2006

4.5 stars Editor's rating Mar. 20, 2006

Pricing not available

Review

2005 Acura RL

The 2005 Acura RL offers one of the richest blends of technologies in a car today.

By May. 10, 2005

4 stars Editor's rating May. 10, 2005

Pricing not available

Review

Sanyo RL-4920 (Sprint)

Though the battery life for Sanyo's RL-4920 was a bit disappointing, it's a solid performer with good features.

By Oct. 21, 2004

3.5 stars Editor's rating Oct. 21, 2004

Pricing not available