2 Results for

pn64e7000

Samsung PN64E7000

  • 3D: Active 3D
  • Display Format: 1080p
  • Diagonal Size: 64 in
  • Type: Plasma
Review

Samsung PN64D7000

With picture quality on par with the best TVs we've ever tested, the Samsung PND7000 plasma represents an excellent value for videophiles who don't demand to own the top of the line.

Jan. 7, 2011

4 stars Editors' rating on Oct. 11, 2011
3.5 stars User rating out of 3 reviews
Editors' Take

Samsung PN51E7000

The plasma that tries harder.

Jan. 8, 2012

Editors' Take

Samsung PN60E7000

The plasma that tries harder.

Jan. 10, 2012

0.5 stars User rating out of 1 reviews
Review

Samsung PN64E8000

The expensive Samsung PNE8000 series comes through with stellar picture quality, but its main appeal is to people who crave the latest gadgetry in their plasma TV.

Jan. 10, 2012

3.5 stars Editors' rating on Apr. 18, 2012
3 stars User rating out of 2 reviews
Review

Samsung PN64E550

While not quite the best in its class, the Samsung PNE550 plasma still merits a look with its very good picture quality, sophisticated Smart TV platform, and attractive price.

Apr. 10, 2012

3.5 stars Editors' rating on Aug. 30, 2012
Review

Samsung PN58C7000 - 58" 3D plasma TV

Among the better 2D performers available, the Samsung PNC7000 series plasma also delivers 3D for less than the competition.

Mar. 12, 2010

4 stars Editors' rating on Jul. 14, 2010
0.5 stars User rating out of 1 reviews
Review

Samsung PN63C7000 - 63" 3D plasma TV

Among the better 2D performers available, the Samsung PNC7000 series plasma also delivers 3D for less than the competition.

Mar. 12, 2010

4 stars Editors' rating on Jul. 14, 2010
Review

Samsung PN50C7000

Among the better 2D performers available, the Samsung PNC7000 series plasma also delivers 3D for less than the competition.

Mar. 12, 2010

4 stars Editors' rating on Jul. 14, 2010

MSRP: $1,799.99

Review

Samsung PN59D7000

With picture quality on par with the best TVs we've ever tested, the Samsung PND7000 plasma represents an excellent value for videophiles who don't demand to own the top of the line.

Jan. 7, 2011

4 stars Editors' rating on Oct. 11, 2011
3.5 stars User rating out of 5 reviews