The electronics titans square off in a tangled tale of mobile technology, centered on Apple's iPhone
Now that the new trial option has been squashed, the next likely stop for Oracle in its bid to win its IP suit against Google is the appeals court.
Oracle and Google want to address issue of "willfulness to infringe" now in order to get around more complicated issues in phase three -- or possibly to avoid a third phase altogether.
A unanimous jury found that Google infringed on Oracle's Java, but failed to say whether Google had made "fair use" of the material. Google called for a mistrial.
Jury in highly watched trial is facing some tough times over highly technical terminology and even personal illness.
Google has been vindicated over claims of patent infringement, but let's take a closer look at some of the winners and losers in this case so far.
The jury came back with more questions, suggesting that it might be not be so close to a verdict after all, and might be back at square one.
The jury returns with two more questions, which suggest that they could be on the road to finding Google infringed on Oracle's copyrights.
Wondering what the lawyers and programmers are talking about in the highest-profile tech trial in years? Here's a guide to the ties between Android and Java -- and the history leading up to the case.
Oracle cuts to the chase in the second part of the trial, recalling Tim Lindholm, who has turned out to be a prominent figure in this case.
A judge had directed the companies to come clean about who they were paying to comment and report on their copyright infringement lawsuit while it was being litigated.