1 Results for

lc-60le945u

Editors' Take

Sharp LC50UB30U

Sharp has announced its entry-level range of 4K TVs, the UB30s, which will come in four sizes, including a 50-inch for $999.

January 5, 2015

MSRP: $999.99

Editors' Take

Sharp LC60UE30

Sharp's new UE30 series is the company's mainstream 4K lineup for 2015 with three different sizes and features Google's Android TV onboard.

January 4, 2015

MSRP: $2,749.00

Editors' Take

Sharp LC-65LE653U

At CES 2015 Sharp has introduced the LE653 range of televisions, with sizes up to 65 inches and including smart TV and a dual-core processor.

January 3, 2015

Pricing not available

Review

Panasonic TC-60AS530U

The Panasonic AS530 series LCD ain't no plasma, but it offers attractive design and decent image quality for a budget price.

July 16, 2014

3.5 stars Editors' rating on July 17, 2014
Review

Sharp LC 60UQ17U

While the Sharp LC-UQ17U offers decent picture quality its pseudo-4K features simply aren't worth paying extra for.

February 23, 2014

3 stars Editors' rating on May 30, 2014
Review

Sharp LC 80UQ17U

While the Sharp LC-UQ17U offers decent picture quality its pseudo-4K features simply aren't worth paying extra for.

February 23, 2014

3 stars Editors' rating on May 30, 2014
Review

Sharp LC 70UQ17U

While the Sharp LC-UQ17U offers decent picture quality its pseudo-4K features simply aren't worth paying extra for.

February 23, 2014

3 stars Editors' rating on May 30, 2014
Review

Sharp LC 60LE757U - 60" 3D LED TV

The stylish, Quattron-equipped Sharp LC-LE757U series doesn't offer a very good picture for the price.

January 7, 2013

3 stars Editors' rating on September 19, 2013
4 stars User rating out of 2 reviews
Review

Sharp LC-70LE757U

The stylish, Quattron-equipped Sharp LC-LE757U series doesn't offer a very good picture for the price.

March 28, 2013

3 stars Editors' rating on September 19, 2013
3.5 stars User rating out of 2 reviews
Review

Sharp LC-80LE757U

The stylish, Quattron-equipped Sharp LC-LE757U series doesn't offer a very good picture for the price.

March 28, 2013

3 stars Editors' rating on September 19, 2013
0.5 stars User rating out of 1 reviews