456 Results for

la7400

Editors' Take

LG 55LA7400

The LG' LA7400 is the second-in-charge of LG's 2013 line and features voice control and a slim design.

January 4, 2013

5 stars User rating out of 1 reviews
Editors' Take

LG 60LA7400

The LG' LA7400 is the second-in-charge of LG's 2013 line and features voice control and a slim design.

April 12, 2013

Editors' Take

LG 47LA7400

The LG' LA7400 is the second-in-charge of LG's 2013 line and features voice control and a slim design.

January 2, 2013

4.5 stars User rating out of 1 reviews
Editors' Take

Toshiba 55L7400

Toshiba's L7400 features a brighter panel and local dimming for better contrast plus more colors than a traditional television

January 3, 2014

Pricing not available

Review

LG 55LA8600

Although its lovely frame is packed with well-executed features, the flagship-priced LG LA8600 series LED LCD TV has the picture of a midrange model.

January 2, 2013

3 stars Editors' rating on August 2, 2013
4.5 stars User rating out of 1 reviews
Editors' Take

LG 55LA9650

Joining Samsung and Sony in the nacent 4K TV price war, LG debuts its least-expensive versions yet. Like those of LG's compeditors, these TV start at $3500.

September 30, 2013

4.5 stars User rating out of 1 reviews
Review

LG 47LA6200

The midrange LG LA6200 LED LCD TV gets points for looks and smarts, but loses even more due to its picture quality.

January 15, 2013

2.5 stars Editors' rating on August 26, 2013
3.5 stars User rating out of 4 reviews
Review

LG 42LA6200 - 42" Class ( 41.9" viewable ) 3D LED TV

The midrange LG LA6200 LED LCD TV gets points for looks and smarts, but loses even more due to its picture quality.

January 15, 2013

2.5 stars Editors' rating on August 26, 2013
4.5 stars User rating out of 1 reviews
Review

LG 50LA6200

The midrange LG LA6200 LED LCD TV gets points for looks and smarts, but loses even more due to its picture quality.

January 3, 2013

2.5 stars Editors' rating on August 26, 2013
Review

LG 55LA6200

The midrange LG LA6200 LED LCD TV gets points for looks and smarts, but loses even more due to its picture quality.

January 15, 2013

2.5 stars Editors' rating on August 26, 2013
5 stars User rating out of 3 reviews