386 Results for

jvc gr-da30us mini dv camcorder

Narrow your search

Content Type
Topic

JVC GR D750 Mini DV Camcorder

  • Optical Sensor Type: CCD
  • Width: 2.4 in
  • Depth: 4.5 in
  • Height: 3.7 in
Review

JVC GR-DV3000

Still at the top of JVC's MiniDV line after all this time, the DV3000 has some flaws but deserves a look from budget buyers.

January 20, 2003

3 stars Editors' rating on October 8, 2003

MSRP: $1,499.99

Review

JVC Everio GZ-HM320 Camcorder (Black)

The four sibling models--the JVC Everio GZ-HM300, HM320, HM340, and HD500--deliver subpar video for even their dirt-cheap prices.

January 14, 2010

3 stars Editors' rating on July 8, 2010
Editors' Take

JVC GR-D270

JVC GR-D270

March 10, 2005

MSRP: $329.95

Editors' Take

JVC GR-D250

JVC GR-D250

March 6, 2005

Pricing not available

Review

JVC Everio GZ-MG30U

Though the short battery life and mediocre image quality are frustrating, the JVC Everio GZ-MG30U's amazing recording capacity and tiny size still make it an enticing device.

June 14, 2005

3 stars Editors' rating on September 26, 2005
Review

JVC Marshmallow (Silver)

The JVC Marshmallow headphones are an exceptional value thanks to an ultralow price tag combined with solid audio quality, noise isolation capability, and a secure fit.

February 21, 2008

3.5 stars Editors' rating on August 20, 2009
Review

JVC Everio GZ-HD3

As a scaled-down version of JVC's GZ-HD7, the GZ-HD3 ditches some of the fancier features, but its price is still higher than we'd like for this camcorder.

July 19, 2007

3 stars Editors' rating on October 15, 2007
Review

JVC Everio GZ-HD7

If this camcorder cost $500, we'd give it a much higher rating. But for its quadruple-digit price, we expect far better performance and video quality from the JVC Everio GZ-HD7.

April 5, 2007

3 stars Editors' rating on May 31, 2007
Review

JVC Everio GZ-MG21

The JVC GZ-MG21 is a nice idea, but its poor video quality and irritating control scheme make conventional camcorders seem a lot more appealing.

January 6, 2006

2.5 stars Editors' rating on May 12, 2006