A 26-year-old Oregon man is told that cell phone use is verboten on jury duty. Sadly, he is unable to comply.
Since losing a $1 billion patent-infringement judgment to Apple, Samsung has accused the jury foreman of withholding important information and suggested Apple knew about it. Apple says the claims are bunk.
Manuel Ilagan, one of the nine jurors who ruled in favor of Apple, tells CNET he thought Samsung's internal e-mails about incorporating some of Apple's technology into its devices, and the evasive way Samsung executives answered questions, was damning.
The court will hear Samsung's claim that the jury foreman in its patent case with Apple was biased due to previous dealings with a partner.
What appears not to have moved the jurors much were the high-priced experts paid to testify.
A juror in the case has spilled the beans on how it came to award Apple more than $1bn.
Review some of the evidence and other trial highlights that stuck out in the minds of the Apple v. Samsung jury.
Verdict deliberations in Oracle v. Google have been mixed up as the jury looks like it might be stuck on the question of infringement once again.
A juror in a UK trial contacts a defendant on Facebook, where they have a long chat about things. She is found guilty of contempt of court, as is the defendant.
California juror required to divulge contents of Facebook account plans appeal of court order, which tests the limit of fair trial and privacy rights in era of social media.