The software maker is struggling to make sure its online stores are clean, well-lighted places for apps, even as it readies the update to its Windows operating system.
Apple TV, iTunes and the App Store are among the products and services named as violating the interactive software pioneer's patents.
A San Jose jury rules against the nonpracticing entity, which had accused Apple of infringing its mobile device technology.
The US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals' decision means Samsung has two options: appeal the case to the Supreme Court or hand over to Apple hundreds of millions of dollars.
British police have come up with a new way of cutting off funding to websites that illegally share music and movies.
If you're a Google Fiber user and are suspected of downloading illegal content, you may reportedly find yourself on the receiving end of automatic demands for money.
The court rules that Samsung did violate some of Apple's design patents, but finds the Korean company did not copy the overall packaging of the product.
The jury has returned its verdict in this year's big Apple v. Samsung case. Check out what devices were found to violate which patents.
The Cupertino, Calif., company has argued throughout the trial that the case is not about Google and that Samsung copied Apple out of desperation.
The Korean electronics maker now wants about $6.2 million, not $6.8 million, for Apple's accused infringement of two Samsung patents.