54 Results for

casio g'zone type-s

Article

Casio G'zOne Type-S now sports push-to-talk

Casio/Verizon Wireless G'zOne Type-S now sports push-to-talk

By April 3, 2008

Review

Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE (Verizon)

The Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE is an excellent and affordable rugged handset, but skip it if taking great pictures is a priority.

By August 22, 2013

3.5 stars Editors' rating August 22, 2013
Article

Verizon Wireless launches the rugged G'zOne Type-S

Verizon Wireless launches the G'zOne Type-S

By May 31, 2007

Article

Verizon Wireless G'zOne Type-S spotted on FCC

Verizon Wireless G'zOne Type-S

By May 23, 2007

Article

Whopper of a Burger King deal: A side of free smartphone

Burger King offers a free Android smartphone with your chicken fries, but the fine print shows it's business as usual. Crave's Amanda Kooser digs in.

By August 25, 2014

Article

Verizon adds Push to Talk Plus to Galaxy S5, more

The walkie-talkie ease of push-to-talk meets modern smartphones in Verizon's rebooted service for business.

By August 7, 2014

Video

The Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE is a Hulk of a handset

With its rubber-encased body, waterproof capabilities, and Verizon 4G LTE, the Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE is the kind of phone you 'd want around for the apocalypse.

By August 22, 2013

Review

UTStarcom G'zOne Type-S

Though it is has rather basic offerings, the Verizon Wireless G'zOne Type-S is a rugged and sturdy phone perfect for extreme sports enthusiasts, industrial workers, and those who just want a reliable and durable phone.

By June 1, 2007

3.5 stars Editors' rating June 1, 2007

Pricing not available

Article

Verizon upgrades rugged G'zOne series with LTE model

The Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE is largely the same as its immediate predecessor, while adding support for the carrier's high-speed data network.

By June 25, 2013

Review

Casio G'zOne Ravine 2

The Casio G'zOne continues Casio's long tradition of ultrarugged phones with the bonus of improved call quality.

By January 4, 2012

3.5 stars Editors' rating January 4, 2012