The electronics titans square off in a tangled tale of mobile technology, centered on Apple's iPhone
CNET breaks down Amazon's newly unveiled Fire phone handset, and see how its specs compare to Apple and Samsung's current flagships.
Apple and Samsung will have one hour each to present more testimony Monday, rather than wrap up evidence Friday, because of an appeals court ruling related to one of the patents at issue in the case.
The company wrapped up its witness testimony after several experts and executives said Apple should receive $2.19 billion from Samsung.
The U.S. International Trade Commission says its ruling, which could result in a ban of some Samsung devices in the U.S., will come next week.
The Cupertino, Calif., company has argued throughout the trial that the case is not about Google and that Samsung copied Apple out of desperation.
After defending itself against claims that it violated Apple's patents for the iPhone, the Korean electronics maker accused its smartphone rival of violating two Samsung patents.
Assuming Samsung infringed Apple's five patents, Apple should receive $1.75 per device in royalties, not the $40 Apple has requested, a Samsung expert argues. Samsung rested its case after the expert testimony.
Dale Sohn, the former CEO of Samsung's mobile business in the US, also testifies that a shift in the Korean company's sales and marketing efforts boosted its position in the smartphone market.
Apple, during opening arguments in a new patent infringement trial, wants $2 billion in damages from smartphone rival Samsung.
Six women and four men -- few of whom have technical backgrounds -- will decide what infringement occurred and how much money is owed in damages.