Can a stack of iPhones protect a Samsung Galaxy S6 from a blast fired from a Russian assault rifle? You'll just have to watch and see.
The electronics titans square off in a tangled tale of mobile technology, centered on Apple's iPhone and iPad, that delves into where one company's designs end and another's begin.
The decision marks the end of a patent-infringement trial between the two mobile phone giants. Tune back to CNET for more details.
Closing arguments in the patent-infringement case between the world's two largest smartphone makers will take place Tuesday. Then it's up to the eight-person jury in the San Jose, Calif. federal court to decide who prevails.
Apple and Samsung will have one hour each to present more testimony Monday, rather than wrap up evidence Friday, because of an appeals court ruling related to one of the patents at issue in the case.
The jury of six women and two men have determined Samsung must pay $290 million more to Apple for patent infringement.
The smartphone giants settled their patent suits outside the US. But that may mean they'll pay even more attention to Apple's home turf.
After Taylor Swift revived a public debate over payments to artists by streaming-music services, Prince is the next high-profile musician to pull his catalog off some Web venues.
Unlike Apple's clear victory in the first Apple v. Samsung trial over patent infringement, this time around the jury returned a mixed verdict. CNET's Kara Tsuboi and Shara Tibken explain why the case was about more than money.
The jury has returned its verdict in this year's big Apple v. Samsung case. Check out what devices were found to violate which patents.
The tech companies battled in a San Jose, Calif., court over patents. CNET breaks down what happened during the monthlong trial.