Technically Incorrect: A Seattle cyclist is miffed that a woman has parked in a bike lane. He posts a helmet-cam video to YouTube, where many have watched. But who comes out of it better?
The electronics titans square off in a tangled tale of mobile technology, centered on Apple's iPhone
Sprint, AT&T and other carriers have lined up with a wide range of pricing options for consumers. Samsung has a lot riding on getting off to a good start.
After a second round of deliberations, the jury gives a decisive victory to prominent venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins, which was being sued for gender discrimination by former junior partner Ellen Pao.
Technically Incorrect: A prankster troupe invades an Apple store, masquerading as employees. What results is instructive.
The decision marks the end of a patent-infringement trial between the two mobile phone giants. Tune back to CNET for more details.
Closing arguments in the patent-infringement case between the world's two largest smartphone makers will take place Tuesday. Then it's up to the eight-person jury in the San Jose, Calif. federal court to decide who prevails.
The closely watched sex discrimination case is winding down, but both sides know that whatever the jury decides could have far-reaching implications.
Apple and Samsung will have one hour each to present more testimony Monday, rather than wrap up evidence Friday, because of an appeals court ruling related to one of the patents at issue in the case.
The jury of six women and two men have determined Samsung must pay $290 million more to Apple for patent infringement.
These two top flagship smartphones both pack high-end designs and features to boot. Here's how they stack up against each other.