|HDMI inputs||2 back, 1 side||Component video inputs||1 back|
|Composite video input(s)||1 back||S-video input(s)||0|
|VGA-style PC input(s)||1||RF input(s)||1|
|AV output(s)||1 audio||Digital audio output||1 optical|
|USB port||1 side||Ethernet (LAN) port||No|
While Vizio's higher-end HDTVs have an abundance of inputs, the E0VL models do not. The complement of HDMI is adequate at three total, but some buyers might chafe at just one component and one composite-video input. The side panel also lacks the traditional analog input.
The overall picture quality of Vizio's E0VL series competes well against the similarly featured Sony and Samsung models we tested, although we'd rate it a notch below those on account of its less-impressive black levels and off-angle performance. Color in bright areas was a strong suit, however, and there were no major issues with video processing or uniformity; the latter proved better than typical edge-lit LCDs, in fact.
The initial settings of the Movie mode came closest to our ideal for critical viewing, with a linear if slightly reddish grayscale and dim (26 ftl) light output. Gamma was a disappointing and entirely too-dark 2.7, perhaps due to some combination of the Active Luma and Dynamic Backlight controls, which were engaged by default. We turned both off for our calibration, naturally, and ended up with an excellent linear grayscale (aside from the standard blue skew in dark areas) and also very good gamma (2.19 average, versus our 2.2 target).
The bulk of our image quality tests were conducted with the help of "The Blind Side" and the lineup below.
|Comparison models (details)|
|Samsung LN46C630||46-inch LCD|
|Sony KDL-46EX500||46-inch LCD|
|Panasonic TC-P46S2||46-inch plasma|
|Samsung UN46C6500||46-inch edge-lit LED|
|Sony KDL-46EX700||46-inch edge-lit LED|
Black level: Among the TVs in our lineup the Vizio E0VL series reproduced the lightest shade of black, appearing a bit brighter than the Sony EX700 in most scenes and noticeably brighter than the others. One example came in Chapter 5 when the family picks up Michael walking home at night; the night sky above the house, the deepest shadows in his hair, and the silhouette of the black BMW all looked brighter and less realistic than on the other sets.
Aside from the brighter blacks, which made shadowy areas less impactful in general, shadows were relatively well-detailed on the Vizio. It didn't obscure areas like the edge of the roof or the shaded bush as much as the Samsung C630, nor did details look overly bright, as they did on the Panasonic S2 and the EX700.
Color accuracy: The E0VL performed very well in this category, as did the Sony and Samsung non-LED-based LCDs, but we give Vizio the slight edge overall between the three in bright areas. To its advantage, skin tones, like the face of Leigh Anne as she fluffs Michael's pillow in the living room, looked the closest to our reference, with a degree of warmth that was missing to some extent on the Sony EX500 and Samsung C630. It also lacked the golden overtones and greenish tint of the S2. Primary colors, like the green of the football field in Chapter 12, were spot-on and well saturated, although overall saturation did suffer a bit with the Vizio's lighter blacks.
Speaking of blacks, the E0VL showed the bluish tinge in dark areas we've come to expect from LCDs, and it was significantly more obvious than on the Samsung C630 and Sony EX500, but not as bad as on the EX700.
Video processing: The E0VL series performed fairly well in this category. Vizio equips the TV with a pair of controls related to dejudder, which it calls Smooth Motion Effect--with Low, Medium, and High settings--and Real Cinema Mode, with settings entitled Precision and Smooth. As with most such processing, we prefer to leave it off for film-based movies, which smoothing can make look too much like video. The Low setting, when we did engage the control, produced the fewest artifacts and least-objectionable effect and even preserved some judder, similar to Standard on the Sony EX500, but smoother. Higher settings piled on the processing. As with previous Vizios, we couldn't see much difference between either of the Real Cinema Mode settings.
Our motion resolutionmotion resolution test revealed that, in terms of reducing blurring, the 120Hz E0VL performed about as well as the 240Hz Vixio XVT3 series and as well as the Samsungs in our comparison, beating the Sony EX500 by a hair. It maxed out at between 600 and 700 lines in any setting with dejudder engaged (and the standard 300-400 with it turned off). Real Cinema had no effect on these numbers, and as usual we weren't able to tell the difference in motion resolution with real program material, as opposed to test patterns.
The E0VL handled 1080p/24 material well. Disabling dejudder processing caused it to implement proper film cadence during the helicopter flyover from "I Am Legend," with no smoothing and regular motion free of the slight hitch seen on some TVs.
Uniformity: Overall the Vizio was a bit better than the edge-lit LED models at maintaining a consistent image across the screen, but it fell short of the non-LED LCDs from Sony and Samsung. In bright fields the edges appeared a bit brighter than the middle, and we saw some vertical banding in test patterns, but both were quite difficult to spot in normal program material. There were no obvious bright corners or other spotting on our review sample.
Off-angle performance was relatively poor. As with past Vizios the E0VL lost black-level fidelity more quickly than competing models, and suffered from more-noticeable color shift, especially in darker areas. By way of comparison, the Panasonic S2 plasma was essentially perfect in both off-angle performance and screen uniformity.
Bright lighting: The E0VL has a matte screen, which serves it well in bright rooms where lights, windows, and bright objects cause reflections. Such objects appeared dimmer and much less distinct, and thus less distracting, than they did on the glossy UNC6500, for example. The E0VL also trounced the lowly Panasonic S2 at maintaining black-level fidelity under the lights. Overall it turned in the same very good performance as the similarly matte EX700, Samsung LNC650 and Sony EX500 in this category.
Standard-definition: The set did somewhat below average on our standard-def tests, delivering the full resolution of DVD but looking a tad soft on the detail shot of the grass and stone bridge. Jaggies on moving diagonal lines were more prevalent than on either the Sony or Samsung LCDs, and while a bit less obvious than on the Panasonic plasma, they still plagued the shot of a waving American flag, for example. Noise reduction did function well to clean up the low-quality shots of skies and sunsets, however, the set engaged film mode, detecting 2:3 pull-down, properly.
PC: The Vizio aced our PC tests, as we expect an LCD TV to do. It delivered every line of 1,020x1,080-pixel resolution via both VGA and HDMI, with sharp text and minimal edge enhancement.
|Before color temp (20/80)||6353/6411||Good|
|After color temp||6561/6508||Good|
|Before grayscale variation||98||Good|
|After grayscale variation||49||Good|
|Color of red (x/y)||0.634/0.332||Good|
|Color of green||0.29/0.602||Good|
|Color of blue||0.147/0.061||Good|
|Defeatable edge enhancement||Y||Good|
|480i 2:3 pull-down, 24 fps||Pass||Good|
|1080i video resolution||Pass||Good|
|1080i film resolution||Pass||Good|
Power consumption: Though not quite at the same level of efficiency as the Samsung and Sony non-LED-based LCDs, the Vizio is still no power hog. That high default number in the Geek Box is mostly due to a relatively bright Standard setting; the playing field is much more even once the three are calibrated for equal light output.
|Vizio E470VL||Picture settings|
|Picture on (watts)||174.96||106.84||N/A|
|Picture on (watts/sq. inch)||0.19||0.11||N/A|
|Cost per year||$38.61||$23.67||N/A|
|Score (considering size)||Good|