Samsung SSG-4100GB (2012 model) review: Samsung SSG-4100GB (2012 model)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

CNET Editors' Rating

3 stars Good
  • Overall: 6.4
  • Design: 4.0
  • Features: 5.0
  • Performance: 7.0
  • Value: 7.0
Review Date:
Updated on:

The Good The Samsung SSG-4100GB glasses are inexpensive for active glasses and compatible with other brands of TVs thanks to the Full HD 3D standard. Pairing them with your TV is fairly straightforward, they don't require line-of-sight, and the battery lasts a long time.

The Bad The glasses are fairly flimsy, the arms are quite short, and the fit is uncomfortable, especially if you wear glasses. An open design lets in more ambient light and can hinder immersion. They're not rechargeable and require a coin battery.

The Bottom Line The Samsung SSG-4100GB universal glasses are cheap and fine for casual use, but an uncomfortable fit and too-open design means 3D enthusiasts will want other primary glasses.

Editors' Top Picks

Last year, three of the "big four" television manufacturers announced along with 3D glasses maker XpanD they were pooling their resources to create a single standard for active 3D glasses , called the Full HD 3D Glasses Initiative. Until now, glasses built by one manufacturer weren't able to be used on a TV by another. A single standard means you can, for example, take your glasses to your friend's house to watch the Olympics in 3D--provided he or she has a compatible active 3D TV.

While Sony's 2012 3D TVs like the HX750 still use proprietary glasses, Samsung and Panasonic are now selling 2012 glasses and TVs that comply with the standard and earn the special logo. Of most interest will be the cheaper glasses, the Samsung SSG-4100GB, which sell for $20 online. The Panasonic TY-ER3D4MU glasses go for around $60. Both will work with any 2012 Samsung or Panasonic active 3D TV and any future TV that complies with the Full HD 3D standard.

Design and fit
The SSG-4100GB glasses are quite lightweight, which is a plus, but the construction is plasticky and doesn't feel as hard-wearing as the Panasonic's. The glasses arrive in three pieces: the main frame housing the lenses, and two temples (the legs of the glasses that extend from the lenses to the ears). Some assembly was required.

We snapped the temples into the frame to either side of the nose bridge and immediately noticed they were quite short. If you wear them over regular prescription glasses, the bridge perches uncomfortably on the end of your nose. Additionally, the snap-on temples detach quite easily from the rims that hold the lenses, so longevity could be an issue. By contrast, the Panasonics have much longer temples that are hinged for better rigidity, and are quite comfortable regardless of whether you fit them over prescription glasses.

The on-off control on the Samsung is situated just above the nose, and holding down the small button pairs the glasses to the TV. We had no trouble pairing them to either TV as long as we held them close to the screen. The glasses use Bluetooth instead of infrared so they don't need a physical view of the TV, which means you don't have to resync them if you lose line of sight for some reason. Between the lenses there's a small compartment that houses a watch battery (size CR2025); Panasonic's TY-ER3D4MU glasses are rechargeable, whereas the SSG-4100GBs are not. Samsung claims the glasses last for 150 hours before needing a new battery.

Performance
The Samsung and Panasonic glasses performed about the same, although if we had to pick one based on picture quality alone, it would be the Panasonic.

Editors' Top Picks

 

ARTICLE DISCUSSION

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Quick Specifications See All

  • CE Product Type 3D glasses
  • Battery and Power Battery Powered
  • Glasses included 1 pair
About The Author

Ty Pendlebury reviews televisions in CNET's New York office. He originally hails from CNET Australia. Ty's interests include gaming, indie music, hi-fi, streaming media, movies, literature, and cycling.

About The Author

Section Editor David Katzmaier has reviewed TVs at CNET since 2002. He is an ISF certified, NIST trained calibrator and developed CNET's TV test procedure himself. Previously David wrote reviews and features for Sound & Vision magazine and eTown.com.