Though front-facing video recording has fewer options, it still retains a good number of features. There are still the brightness meter, silly faces and background options, white balances, color effects, geotagging, and audio muting feature. There are also five video sizes (ranging from 720p to MMS).
Photo quality for the 5-megapixel camera was respectable. Even in cloudy outdoor lighting, colors were true to life and popped with a certain amount of vibrancy. Objects did tend to blur outside the focal range, but for the most part, outlines were sharp and distinct. Pictures taken in dimmer indoor lighting understandably fared a bit worse. There was a noticeable amount of digital noise and graininess, and objects looked a lot more blurry.
Video quality was also good. There was no lag between my moving of the camera and the video feedback, audio picked up well, and images (both moving and still) remained crisp and in focus. Colors were accurate, and the focus adjusted quickly.
I tested the tri-band (1900/800/850) Spirit 4G in San Francisco. Call quality was adequate, though there were a few times when I heard my own voice echoing in the background. Other than that disturbance, however, none of my calls dropped and audio didn't cut in and out. I heard my friends easily and clearly, though maximum volume could have been louder.
Voices on audio speaker, aside from already sounding harsh and tinny, could have been louder as well. My friends reported to me that I sounded fine. They were not able to hear the echoing that I heard, and they said that in moments of complete silence, they could hear a subtle static noise.
LG Spirit 4G call quality sample
MetroPCS' 4G LTE network isn't the most robust, but data speeds were respectable and remained consistently fast and stable throughout testing. Loading the CNET mobile and desktop sites, for example, took an average of 8 and 10 seconds, respectively. The New York Times' desktop site clocked in at 13 seconds, and its mobile site also took 5 seconds to load. Altogether, ESPN took a faster time to load, with its mobile site taking 5 seconds on average, and its full site loading in 9 seconds. The 32.41MB gamedownloaded and installed in an average of one minute and 18 seconds, and Ookla showed me an average of 4.59Mbps down and 3.90Mbps up.
|LG Spirit 4G||Performance testing|
|Average 4G LTE download speed||4.59Mpbs|
|Average 4G LTE upload speed||3.90Mbps|
|App download (Temple Run 2)||32.41MB in 1 minute and 18 seconds|
|CNET mobile site load||8 seconds|
|CNET desktop site load||10 seconds|
|Restart time||32 seconds|
|Camera boot time||2.22 seconds|
Powered by a zippy dual-core 1.2GHz Snapdragon processor, the device runs very smoothly. Not only did it show no problem executing simple tasks, like scrolling through its five home screen pages and the app drawer, it also took care of more complicated tasks in a timely manner. Opening the camera took, on average, 2.22 seconds, while restarting the handset took 32 seconds. I also didn't experience any stuttering or stalling when I played the graphic-intense game Riptide GP. Though I've seen higher frame-rates and smoother game-play on other top-tier phones (like the Nexus 4), the Spirit still handled the animations speedily.
The handset has 4.3GB of internal memory and a 2,150mAh battery, which has a reported talk time of up to seven hours. During our battery drain test, it lasted 8.08 hours of video playback. According to FCC radiation standards, the phone has a digital SAR rating of 1.05W/kg.
If $200 is way out of your budget, I suggest going for the $50 . You won't get the Spirit's big, bright screen, but for one-fourth of its price, you'll get a decent camera, the dual-core CPU, and Android 4.0.
But, if you're looking to spend $200 anyway, the Spirit 4G is an excellent choice. As one of the few MetroPCS handsets that ship with Android 4.0, it's still a reasonably priced phone that I'd recommend over its like-priced rival, thedue to the faster processor and updated OS. And as I previously mentioned, the Spirit is an obvious choice over the next few smartphones that are just as behind as the Anthem 4G, but way more expensive.