LG Flatron W2053TQ review:

LG Flatron W2053TQ

The W2053TQ achieved a brightness score of 270 candelas per square meter (cd/m2)--lower than LG's claimed 300 cd/m2 max. The W2009m fared a bit worse with a brightness of 255 cd/m2. On our black screen test, both monitors exhibited heavy backlight bleedthrough on the top and bottom edges of the displays.

We looked at "Kill Bill Vol. 1" on DVD and were pleasantly surprised by the lack of ghosting in both monitors in our ghosting test scene--a close-up of The Bride's big toe. Colors looked full, but didn't have the "pop" we desired. Also, due to the backlight bleeding, the black bars at the top and bottom of the screen are distractingly light. Unreal Tournament 3 looked fairly vibrant on both monitors; however, their relatively low brightness prevented the colors from having the impact you'd want in a game. The game however, played quickly with no signs of streaking, trails, or pixel lag.

The optimal viewing angle for a monitor is usually directly in front, about a quarter of the screen's distance down from the top. At this angle, you're viewing the colors and gamma correction as they were intended. Most monitors are made to be viewed only at that angle. Depending on its panel type, picture quality at nonoptimal angles varies. Like most monitors, the LG W2053TQ uses a TN panel, which gets overly bright or overly dark when viewed from nonoptimal angles. When we viewed the W2053TQ from the sides or below, the screen appeared to darken only a couple inches off from optimal. From the sides, text is still readable until viewing from about 80 degrees. When viewing from the bottom, the text becomes illegible at about 70 degrees, but never got too dark. Of course, when viewed from the optimal angle, we had no problems.

In the power consumption tests, the LG W2053TQ has a large 3.55-watt power draw on standby, and its On/Default power draw was higher than we'd like for a 20-inch monitor. The LG drew 37.21 watts in this state, compared with the 21.5-inch Lenovo L215, which drew only 28.17 watts. The HP 2009m drew a smaller 30.55 watts in its On/Default state. When we switched on its Eco options, however, the LG improved its carbon footprint drawing only 20.36 watts on the On/Default state. Based on our formula, the LG W2053TQ would cost $13.56 per year to run normally and $8.54 per year with its power-saving features turned on. This is compared with the Lenovo's $8.93 per year and the HP's $9.46.

Juice box
LG Flatron W2053TQ Average watts per hour
On (default luminance) 37.21 (20.46 in eco mode)
On (max luminance) 37.21
On (min luminance) 16.66
Sleep 3.55
Calibrated (200 cd/m2) 28.9
Annual energy cost $13.56 ($8.54 in eco mode)
Score Fair

DisplayMate Tests
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Dell SX2210
HP 2009m

Brightness in cd/m2
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Dell SX2210
HP 2009m

Contrast ratio
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Dell SX2210
Lenovo L215p
HP 2009m

Find out more about how we test LCD monitors.

Service and support
LG backs the Flatron W2053TQ with a three-year parts and labor warranty that covers the backlight for only one year. That's a bit less than other vendors, such as Dell, that usually offer backlight coverage for three years. The company offers repair service in two working days and pays freight shipping both ways for one year. During the second and third year, the customer pays one way and LG pays the return freight. Live Web and e-mail chat are also supported as is toll-free phone support.

What you'll pay

Editors' Top PicksSee All


Discuss: LG Flatron W2053TQ

Conversation powered by Livefyre