LaCie Biggest FW800 review: LaCie Biggest FW800

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

LaCie Biggest FW800 (1 terabyte)

(Part #: 301163U)
3 stars

CNET Editors' Rating

The Good Four connection options: USB 2.0, FW400, FW800, and serial/RS-232; front-mounted LCD advises you of the status of the drive; supports several RAID arrays; supports a variety of file systems; drives are hot-swappable.

The Bad To hot-swap drives, you'll need to purchase LaCie's preinstalled drive trays; no backup utility; has fewer features and is more expensive than comparably sized NAS drives with RAID arrays.

The Bottom Line If you need the fast throughput of a locally connected RAID array, the LaCie Biggest FW800 is a good choice, but if you don't mind the slower transfer speeds of Ethernet, a NAS RAID array can be less expensive and offer more features.

6.8 Overall
  • Design 7.0
  • Features 7.0
  • Performance 6.0
  • Service and support 7.0

The LaCie Biggest FW800 is a four-bay external SATA RAID drive that supports several levels of RAID, hot-swapping, and a variety of connection options. It comes in two capacities: 1 terabyte ($1,050) and 2 terabytes ($1,530). Connection options include USB 2.0, FireWire 800, and FireWire 400 (using a FW400-to-FW800 cable). The included documentation walks you through the simple setup procedure, which does not require you to install drivers. A two-line text LCD sits on the front of the drive and relays information such as the drive's status and RAID level. Two LEDs on each drive bay blink or glow different colors, depending on the drive's status. The Biggest FW800 supports HFS+, FAT32, UNIX, and NTFS file systems, which makes it appropriate for various combinations of operating systems. The only major feature the FW800 lacks is a backup utility, which is odd, considering LaCie does have a proprietary utility in the form of the LaCie 1-Click Backup for Windows PCs and SilverKeeper for Macs.

Most multidisk hard drives of this size and price are network-attached storage drives, making the non-networked Biggest FW800 an expensive option by comparison. For example, the Buffalo Terastation Home Server offers 1 terabyte storage, a media server and print server, and external USB ports, plus a gigabit Ethernet connection--for $900. Our inclination is to spend the money on a NAS drive that offers more features, but LaCie is targeting the professional audio/video producer market that needs local backup and fast throughput for quickly moving large AV files. (Fast Ethernet has a maximum throughput of 100Mbps, while USB 2.0's theoretical max throughput is 480Mbps and FireWire 400's max is 400Mbps.)

Drive type External RAID array
Capacities 1TB, 2TB
Capacity of test unit 1TB
Number of drives/bays Four drives, installed
Maximum capacity 2TB
Hot/cold swap? Hot-swappable drives
Dimensions (HWD) 8.13x6.0x10.57 inches
Notable design features 2-line text LCD; front-loading hot-swappable drive bays; 2 LEDs on each drive bay that indicate drive status
Connection options USB 2.0; FireWire 800 (2 ports); FireWire 400 (using FW400-to-FW800 adapter; serial/RS-232 port
Operating systems supported Windows: 2000, Server 2003, XP, and Vista; Mac OS 10.2.8 or later
Software included none
RAID implementations RAID 0; RAID 0+1; RAID 5; and RAID 5+hot spare
Additional features Driverless installation
Service/support Two-year standard warranty; phone support available weekdays from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. PT (toll call); Web site includes FAQs, online support form, and downloadable software and documentation

Almost all the RAID-capable drives we've tested and reviewed are NAS drives, so we can't make direct comparisons with the LaCie FW800. We tested the drive in its default RAID 5 mode (quick explanation here Using the USB 2.0 connection, the drive wrote our 10GB test folder in 25 minutes, 11 seconds, or 6.78Mbps. It read back the same folder in 9 minutes, 48 seconds, or 17.42Mbps. The FireWire 400 results were very similar: 25 minutes, 27 seconds to write (6.71Mbps) and 9 minutes, 8 seconds (18.71Mbps) to read. These numbers are slower than those for non-RAID hard drives, but that's to be expected. RAID 5 implementations are also slower than RAID 0 or RAID 1 arrays.

Editors' Top PicksSee All

 

Discuss LaCie Biggest FW800 (1 terabyte)

Conversation powered by Livefyre