Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2013)stars
Amazon's next-generation e-reader may look the same as the original, but it's noticeably...
Barnes & Noble Nook GlowLightstars
While it doesn't necessarily beat the Kindle Paperwhite, the $119 Nook GlowLight is an...
Barnes & Noble Nook Simple Touch
Amazon Kindle (2012)
You can look at the Kobo Vox tablet in a couple of different ways.
The objective, unemotional response to it is that it's a middle-of-the-road 7-inch Android tablet that doesn't cost too much got, has OK specs, and a touch of Kobo panache thrown into the interface and the "quilted" back cover that comes in a few different color options.
If you want to be mean about it, you could just say, what's the point? Why bother, Kobo?
I'll go with the objective view and say the Vox is just sort of a meh product. In terms of specs, it's more in line with 2010's Nook Color than the current ($249) and the , which retails for the same $199 price.
Weighing in at 14.2 ounces, the Vox has 8GB of internal memory, plus a microSD card slot for adding cards up to 32GB. As with those aforementioned budget tablets, the Vox is a Wi-Fi-only device with no Bluetooth.
The multitouch screen seems decent enough with 1,024x600-pixel resolution and an antiglare coating. But what puts the Vox behind the identically priced Fire is its single-core 800Mhz processor. Both the Fire and Nook Tablet offer 1GHz dual-core processors and the Tablet's the winner for built-in RAM with 1GB to the Fire's 512MB (the Vox also has half a gigabyte of RAM).
As far as the flavor of Android goes, the Vox runs Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) and offers access to 15,000 free Android apps--but that's through the free GetJar app store, not the full Android Market.
Except for some bugs that Kobo's doing its best to exterminate through a series of firmware updates, there's nothing terribly wrong with the Vox, but by the same token, there's nothing great to say about it, either.