The glossy, white finish of the CubeOne, with its white, softly "breathing" LED is an obvious callback to earlier generations of iPods and MacBooks, and the rest of the system's design feels equally lifted from the Apple portfolio. I'm not saying this is a bad thing -- it suggests a certain accessibility that comes with Apple's old all-white aesthetic, and given that iSmartAlarm is making home security more accessible, that's probably an accurate fit. Still, you can't help but wish they had borrowed just a little bit less from Apple's mid-2000s playbook, not to mention from the playbooks of the countless other companies that have mimicked Apple's approach to branding.
Lifted looks aside, the iSmartAlarm is designed quite well from a standpoint of functionality. The CubeOne, which needs to stay connected to your router, should fit in nicely on whatever shelf you've designated for your network accessories. Its likely proximity to your television and other high-end electronics commonly targeted by thieves make it a logical choice for housing the system's main panic alarm. If you keep your router someplace other than the living room or bedroom, you might consider purchasing an extra siren to ensure the panic alarm sits in earshot of your home's more highly trafficked areas.
The contact sensors apply easily to doors and windows with the included peel-off sticky tags, and are designed to give you plenty of freedom about where they go. Place them high or place them low, as long as each one straddles the gap between the door and the frame, they'll work as promised. This flexibility also means that you can get creative about how you use them. If you're leaving the kids at home for the weekend, you can quickly relocate a sensor onto the liquor cabinet, for instance. You'd have to call a technician to come and rewire your system if you wanted to do that with a subscription-based security service.
Aside from the disappointing iCamera performance, the iSmartAlarm system left me thoroughly impressed. After the painless setup process, everything just worked the way it was supposed to. The motion detector and contact sensors were easy to get situated, and they performed exactly as promised, never failing to catch a trigger.
The remote tags were another huge plus, as there's just something reassuring about having a physical button to press, as opposed to being forced to fiddle with an app every time you wish to arm or disarm the system. In fact, after setting the system up, you wouldn't ever have to use the app if you didn't want to -- just press the arm button on the remote when you leave the house, then the home button as you're coming back in. If someone tries to break in, you'll get a phone call. That level of simplicity is undeniably appealing when we're talking about home automation - the whole point is to make life less complicated, not more so.
The important take-away is that this is a system you can feel comfortable relying upon. For smaller homes in particular, the protection it offers rivals what the established brands can offer and perhaps even surpasses it. Unless you have an especially large home with multiple rooms and openings to protect, the iSmartAlarm will likely be a strong enough performer to grant you the peace of mind you're looking for. I wouldn't set it up at Fort Knox, but for my 800-square-foot apartment, it'd do just fine.
Once you've got it up and running, the iSmartAlarm suite is about as hands-off and maintenance-free as it gets. Just set it up, get into the habit of arming and disarming it according to your schedule, then rest assured that it will be there when you need it. As the smartphone app continues to improve, expect fairly regular updates -- these should download in a matter of seconds, and may well bring new functionality to the system in months to come.
If you decide to upgrade your setup with additional sensors, adding them to the system is a quick process - just turn them on and tell the app to scan for them. Moving the sensors someplace new isn't a problem either; just make sure to disarm the system first. If you use the included sticky pads to attach the contact sensors to your doors or windows, it might take a few minutes of elbow grease to scrub the residue off after removing them.
With the exception of the CubeOne and the iCamera, all of the iSmartAlarm's sirens and sensors are battery operated. The motion detector uses three AA batteries, which come included, while the contact sensors and remote tags each use a single CR2032 button battery, also included. The app includes a separate battery reading for each device, and will let you know when they need to be replaced.
Service and support
iSmartAlarm offers a one-year limited warranty on each system sold. In addition, systems purchased directly through www.ismartalarm.com can be returned unused and in their original packaging for a full refund for up to 30 days following the shipping date.
Technical support is available via e-mail, and also through the system's Web site. iSmartAlarm uses a "support ticket" system, meaning that all support requests can be tracked by the user as they're processed by iSmartAlarm.
Many people see home security systems as an unaffordable luxury, and in many cases rightfully so. After factoring in the contractual period of subscription fees, the cost of even the most basic security package can soar well over $1,500 over a period of just a few years. Installing a home security system definitely wasn't affordable for me back when I was in college, even though I lived in a high-crime area and could have used the protection. Sure enough, our place got robbed one night when a thief broke in through our bathroom window. Amid the anger, fear, and sense of violation, I remember feeling frustrated that our only choices seemed to be spending more than we could afford on additional home security, moving, or continuing on, largely unprotected. My friends and I chose the latter option, though we never really felt safe in that house again after that.
I've been thinking about that robbery quite a bit as I've been testing this system. What I needed back then was a better option, and I'm convinced that iSmartAlarm is that better option. In the case of that bathroom-window break-in, I think that there's a very good chance that the iSmartAlarm's panic siren would have scared the thief off, just as an expensive subscription service probably would have. The key difference is that at $199, the iSmartAlarm is a system that would have been accessible to me back then, and that, more than the technology itself, is what's truly game-changing here. People who've never been able to even consider upgrading their home security finally have access to a legitimate alternative. To me, that's tech at its best.