As I said earlier, though, the Corsair Neutron is relatively new on the market; SSD prices tend to get lower a few months after the release date.
The Corsair Neutron didn't perform as well as the Neutron GTX, but it wasn't that bad, either. The test machine, when using the new drive as its main storage, took about 12 seconds to boot and slightly more than 6 seconds to shut down. While these were very short times, they were actually among the longest for SSDs I've tested.
Nonetheless, applications took very little time to launch, especially when compared with a hard drive in the same setup. In fact, in real-world usage, you probably won't see any difference in application performance between the Neutron and the Neutron GTX.
In data copy tests (data copying isn't the primary use for SSDs, but it shows their performance most clearly), the Neutron did well. As with the previously reviewed SSDs, I tested the drive both when it was used as a secondary drive (and performed only the writing) and when it was used as the main drive of a computer (and performed both writing and reading at the same time). The latter is more representative of what customers will experience with the drive.
When the drive was used as a secondary drive, the Neutron hit 238MBps (compared with the Neutron GTX's 274MBps), among the top six on the charts. When used as the main drive of the test machine, it registered 138MBps; that's about average among the internal drives I've reviewed.
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
|As Secondary drive||As OS drive|
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Fast and relatively affordable, the Corsair Neutron is another excellent SSD on the market, especially if its price gets a little friendlier in the near future.