Asus RT-AC68U Dual-band Wireless-AC1900 Gigabit Router
Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display (15-inch, 2014)
2015 Hyundai Genesis sedan 5.0 RWDstars
Hyundai's new luxury sedan gives us more of everything we liked about the original with...
Beats Studio Wireless Series
It's been a year since I reviewed and lauded the BenQ W1070, and despite some serious competition from the Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 2030, it appears BenQ is still the one to beat in the cheap home-theater projector arena. The W1080ST offers very similar performance to the model we reviewed last time and it adds short-throw capability.
The 1080's picture quality is great at the price, with very good black levels and rich color reproduction. It's not without its faults, though -- a short throw projector without a manual lens shift, leaving just the artifact-prone keystone adjustment in its place, seems like a missed opportunity. Also, the $99 price tag of the semiproprietary, not-included 3D glasses all but guarantees that this feature won't ever be used.
Still, with the added freedom that a short-throw projector brings -- finally you can play Wii without getting in the road -- the BenQ W1080ST offers some serious chops for very little outlay. Given everything else is equal, though, AV enthusiasts will probably want to opt for the BenQ 1070 and its manual lens shift.
Save for a different lens, the design of the BenQ W1080ST is virtually identical to the W1070. It has the mostly white "workplace" design aesthetic that many budget home theater and business projectors share, in addition to top-mounted controls and a rear-facing set of inputs. The 1080 is quite a compact unit at 12.2 inches wide by 4.09 inches high and 9.6 inches deep.
Like the W1070 before it, the front exhaust grille is a problem. While the Epson 2030 features an angled exhaust port to direct stray light away from the screen, the BenQ fired a pattern of weak purple light toward the bottom of our projection. On most material I watched, however, the leakage was virtually undetectable.
One area where did BenQ did improve upon the 1070 with the 1080 is in the design of the remote. While the 1070 featured a dinky, plasticky remote, the 1080ST includes a fully realized clicker that feels good in the hand and includes a backlight.
|Key TV features|
|Projection technology||DLP||Native resolution||1,920x1,080 (1080p)|
|Lumens rating||2,000||Iris control||No|
|3D technology||Active||3D glasses included||No|
|Lens shift||No||Zoom and focus||Manual|
|Lamp lifespan||Up to 6,000 hours||Replacement lamp cost||$249|
|Other: Short throw projector, onboard 10W speaker.|
The W1080ST isn't the upgrade to the W1070 its nomenclature might seem to indicate, but rather its "short-throw" (or "ST") counterpart. Roughly speaking, the 1070 is seemingly designed with dedicated home theater in mind, while the BenQ W1080 is built for flexibility, particularly in placement.
The short-throw lens means it can be placed much closer to the screen than usual. We were able to fill a 120-inch screen from just 75 inches with the W1080ST, as opposed to the long-throw projectors in our lab, which needed to be at least 150 inches away. If you have a smaller screen, you can place it even closer. Of course, the closer to the screen, the less chance you'll have of interfering with the projector's light path, and the closer the projector comes to being more like a big-screen TV.
The BenQ W1080ST features a DLP DarkChip3 chipset and boasts a 2,000-lumen brightness, which is fine for a home theater projector at this price. While the projector includes 3D playback, sadly no glasses are included. The glasses themselves are older-style IR models, and the projector is not compatible with either the Full HD 3D standard (though the BenQ Web site appears to claim they are). I tried using the Samsung SSG-3050GB and the Xpand X104 universals but neither worked. You'll need to buy one pair of BenQ's $99 glasses for each person who wants to watch 3D.
Setup While the Epson 2030 includes quite a few setup-related tweaks, including an automatic keystone, front and rear adjustments and an "A/V mute" (read "lens cover"), by comparison the BenQ's features are sparse. It does have a front height adjustment yes, but only one of the two feet at the rear is adjustable. There is a lens cover too, but it's a transparent, SLR-camera-style one.
Additionally, the scaler on the keystone is quite bad, with blurring and jagged artifacts appearing on straight lines on anything but "0." If you have the opportunity, set the projector up directly in line with the screen. But this brings up a question: why make a short-throw projector -- which is designed to be placed between you and the screen in a low position -- without vertical lens adjustment and a poor keystone? The 1070 has vertical lens adjustment, and I wish that the designers of the 1080 had instituted it in their plans, too. If you plan on putting this projector on a coffee table you will have the choice of either putting up with a parallelogram image or using the the artifacty digital keystone.
As a further note about the setup process, the W1080ST wasn't very cooperative when being set to our reference light output of 16fL. The challenges first began when switching on the device where I saw the blacker than black bars for the first time -- I haven't seen them before when first setting up any other device, and this was in the default mode! As a result it took a fair bit of tweaking to get the picture to look normal at 30fL and then dimming it down even further.