The world of 15-inch ultrabooks has always felt odd to me: Intelâs dream of superthin Windows laptops carried over to a big, wide chassis never seemed right, whether it was the Windows 8 laptop in 2013.back in 2012 or this year's Asus VivoBook S500CA, a budget-range touch-screen
On the other hand, the $699 S500CA (even less, at some retailers) has an attractive price, a clean, good-looking design, booming speakers, and a touch display thatâs responsive and bright, albeit only 1,366x768.
The larger footprint, and its middle-of-the-road battery life, ensure it isnât a killer laptop. But if youâre into big screens and donât want to spend a lot, this isnât a bad bet -- and its processor and performance add up to a better overall value than the similarly large, but slightly more expensive laptops like the still represent a better bet.
|Price as reviewed||$699|
|Processor||1.7GHz Intel Core i5-3317U|
|Memory||6GB, 1,600MHz DDR3|
|Hard drive||500GB 5,400rpm|
|Graphics||Intel HD 4000|
|Dimensions (WD)||15.0 x 10.1 inches|
|Screen size (diagonal)||15.6 inches|
|System weight / Weight with AC adapter||4.8/5.5 pounds|
Sleek brushed black aluminum on the top, a soft-touch bottom underneath, and a silver aluminum keyboard deck inside all give the VivoBook the look of a premium laptop. On this larger-bodied ultrabook, the design aesthetic doesnât seem as thick as the smaller VivoBook I reviewed last year. At 4.8 pounds, itâs lighter than the average 15-inch laptop, but still more than a pound heavier than most smaller ultrabooks. At this weight, youâd almost expect an optical DVD drive, like there is on the-- but there isnât one.
The extra footprint size gives this laptop the heft of a desktop replacement, though. That does away with the whole ultrabook aesthetic. Itâs a computer thatâll feel large in a backpack or have a hard time fitting into one at all. But it's a good deal lighter and slimmer than the average budget 15-inch laptop. It depends on which way you're looking at it.
A big keyboard with a number pad feels reasonably good, but the keys donât have a lot of travel, nor are they backlit. Volume and screen brightness require pressing down the Fn key at the same time, so itâs hard to think of this as a natural multimedia laptop.
Below, a pretty big multitouch clickpad is more than ample enough to handle any Windows 8 gesture. Its actual handling, however, feels more reflective of the budget category the VivoBook slots into: functional, but not exceptional.
Youâll probably spend more time touching the big 15.6-inch display, which is big, bright, and very responsive to touch gestures. Not all is perfect: the screen resolutionâs only 1,366x768 pixels, which amounts to bare-bones functional in the PC universe. Itâs good enough for everyday programs, and videos do look sharp, but you can make out pixelation when reading text or looking at detailed photos. Also, the screenâs viewability breaks down fast when not seen head-on.
SonicMaster-branded speakers with grilles located under the chassis pump out far louder and better-sounding audio than I expected. Theyâre definitely a step above any other budget laptop.
|Asus VivoBook S500CA-DS51T||Average for category [midsize]|
|Video||HDMI, VGA||VGA plus HDMI or DisplayPort|
|Audio||Stereo speakers, combo headphone/microphone jack||Stereo speakers, headphone/microphone jacks|
|Data||1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 2.0, SD card reader||2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 2.0, SD card reader|
|Networking||Ethernet, 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth||Ethernet, 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth|
|Optical drive||None||DVD burner|
Your basic set of ports includes HDMI, VGA, USB 3.0, an SD card slot, and Ethernet. The Ethernet portâs got a hinged pull-down jack, allowing it to fit into the slim body. Nothingâs missing that youâd miss, except maybe a DVD drive.
Itâs really hard to complain about the value package on this VivoBook: $699 (or even less at many Web sites and retailers) gets you a 1.7GHz Intel Core i5-3317U CPU, 6GB of RAM, and a 500GB hybrid hard drive with a 24GB SSD cache. Performance, as youâd expect, matches most ultrabooks featuring that extremely common Core i5 processor. The extra bit of RAM lends a little more zip. Intel HD 4000 integrated graphics are good enough for most uses and for many older games, especially on this displayâs lower screen resolution