Apple iPod Nano review: Apple iPod Nano

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

CNET Editors' Rating

4 stars Excellent
  • Overall: 8.3
  • Design: 9.0
  • Features: 8.0
  • Performance: 8.0
Review Date:
Updated on:

The Good The iPod Nano has a gorgeous, superslim design with a bright, photo-friendly screen. It is easy to operate and works seamlessly with iTunes and the iTunes Music Store, which has the world's largest selection of music. It boasts a nimble processor and system performance with no skipping, thanks to flash memory.

The Bad The iPod Nano suffers from unspectacular battery life, and though the device is durable, it scratches easily; blemishes show up more drastically on the black version. The Nano is pricey in terms of gigabytes per dollar, and its 4GB maximum capacity is not a good fit for many power users. The player skips many sought-after extra features such as FM radio and A/V-out, and it doesn't work with Camera Connector. The USB power adapter ($29) is not included.

The Bottom Line Thanks to its limited capacity, the gorgeous iPod Nano isn't for everybody, but it sets the standard for MP3 players to come.

CNET Editors' Choice Sep '05

Editors' Top PicksSee All

Apple's new iPod Nano is really small

Just when you thought Apple's standard iPod was overly saturating the public consciousness, Steve Jobs and company pull another beauty from the company's bushel. The Apple iPod Nano sets new standards for gadget design and stretches the boundaries of technology. It's the world's first 4GB flash player, yet it's also one of the thinnest. Plus, it boasts a bright color screen that takes advantage of the bigger iPod's photo capabilities, though be aware that the Nano's screen scratches easily. Throw in some ancillary improvements, and you have not only the latest MP3 player phenom but a glance into the future. The flash-based Nano (the name is curiously similar to the Creative Zen Nano Plus's) comes in classic white or black and three capacities: 1GB, 2GB, and 4GB at $149, $199 and $249, respectively. It also replaces the current popular iPod Mini line. The Apple iPod Nano is a design wonder at 3.5 by 1.6 by 0.27 inches and 1.5 ounces. The last two numbers are key--the thing is really thin. As we've said, it looks much smaller in person than in photos, and it truly fits anywhere, comfortably and sometimes invisibly. We've been told that the iPod Nano is 62 percent smaller than the product it's replacing, the iPod Mini (see other Nano size comparisons). The Nano, in terms of MP3 design standards, changes everything. Now, the Creative Zen Micro looks fat, the iRiver H10 looks monstrous, and the Mini looks outdated. Of course, the others are microdrive-based players; the Nano is a flash-based player, the first to hit 4GB; a few companies came out with 2GB models earlier this year but priced them at much more than $200. The 4GB player holds about 1,000 songs or 25,000 photos, while the 2GB version holds about 500 tunes. The 1GB device, then, takes about 250 tracks.


The Apple iPod Nano (4GB, black) next to the Cowon iAudio U2 (1GB, black): The iPod Nano is 0.27 inch thick, while the U2 is 0.7 inch thick. Both are pocket-size, in their own ways.

We have to admit that the Nano is a bit pricey, so we recommend spending the extra $50 to $100 to double or quadruple your capacity. Consumers, after all, have witnessed a rise in price per gigabyte as compared to the $249 6GB iPod Mini and the Zen Micros of the world. But again, flash is the key word; it doesn't skip a beat and is much less susceptible to damage, and without it, the iPod Nano could never be so thin. A skinnier device would be impractical in terms of both usability and fragility. Not only does the iPod Nano's existence as the most luxurious flash-based MP3 player in the world lower flash-based MP3 player prices, but it signals the slow demise of the relatively new microdrive market. We'll see 6GB and 10GB flash-based models someday, though maybe not soon enough for those who simply cannot consider a player with less than 10GB to store their existing or growing music collections.

The iPod Nano's overall design mimics its stouter brother, with the same reflective stainless steel backside, as well as a smaller 1.5-inch color screen and 1.25-inch Click Wheel, compared to the iPod's 2 inches and 1.75 inches, respectively. A solitary hold switch is located on top, while a standard dock connector port and a headphone jack are located underneath. The dock connector opens up an enormous world of accessories, though some may not be ideal; for instance, the iPod Nano works with Altec Lansing's iM7 boombox, albeit awkwardly. The headphone jack has an unusual but necessary placement near the lower-right corner, as one wouldn't physically fit up top. Though it may seem to get in the way, the headphone cable can have a stabilizing effect when you hold the device. It's more natural to slide the iPod Nano into a jeans pocket as well, and of course, the placement makes sense when considering the optional lanyard that transforms the iPod Nano into a wearable device. However, because the jack lacks a four-pin smart connector, the iPod Nano can't be used with certain accessories, including wired remote controls.

Unlike the bigger iPod, the iPod Nano has a thin layer of glossy acrylic on its face, much like the original iPod and the company's line of iBooks; thus, it's very susceptible to scratches and, for the black version, fingerprints. Scratches have a charming effect for some devices, but they take away from the Nano's luster. In fact, many users have complained about how easily the Nano scratches and how the blemishes--including tiny scratches and smudges typical of the iPod family--interfere with viewing text and graphics on the LCD. While scratches are typical for all iPods, the Nano's softer polycarbonate is especially fragile, so you'll need to get a case or a tattoolike skin; alternately, you shouldn't carry it in a pocket full of keys or change. Blemishes are also more noticeable on the black Nano, though both models' screens are the same, of course.

The iPod Nano has no moving internal parts, so it's an ideal fitness companion. It's definitely not as rugged as the LCD-less iPod Shuffle, but thanks to the sturdy steel backside, it can hold its own in terms of durability. However, the device could be bent in half under certain circumstances.

It's certainly easier to operate a full-size iPod, but we have no major complaints about the iPod Nano's interface. Holding it is no problem, though some people will be bothered by the reduced range of motion in operating the smaller Click Wheel. The 16-bit, 172x132-pixel color display is little, but it's bright and colorful and can be used without the backlight in good illumination. It's certainly not an ideal photo viewer, but being able to listen to music while browsing photos is a treat. Because the display is framed by such an attractively thin device, it seems to look better--whether it's the bevel effect or the appreciation of the overall iPod Nano design, we're not sure, but it's one of the most beautiful devices we've ever seen.

Editors' Top PicksSee All

 

Join the discussion

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Quick Specifications See All

  • Release date Sep 7, 2005
  • Built-in Display LCD
  • Run Time (Up To) 14 hour(s)
  • Capacity 1 GB
  • Color white
  • Weight 1.5 oz
  • Supported Digital Audio Standards AAC
    AIFF
    Apple Lossless
    Audible
    MP3
    WAV
  • Installed Size 1 GB
  • Diagonal Size 1.5" m
  • Type 1 year warranty
  • Sound Output Mode stereo
  • Type digital player