X

Space shuttle precursors in action (photos)

As it headed toward the first shuttle flight in space in 1981, NASA worked out the kinks with chunky lifting-body designs and paid homage to the TV show "Star Trek."

Jon Skillings
Jon Skillings is an editorial director at CNET, where he's worked since 2000. A born browser of dictionaries, he honed his language skills as a US Army linguist (Polish and German) before diving into editing for tech publications -- including at PC Week and the IDG News Service -- back when the web was just getting under way, and even a little before. For CNET, he's written on topics from GPS, AI and 5G to James Bond, aircraft, astronauts, brass instruments and music streaming services.
Jon Skillings
EnterpriseHalseFullerton.jpg
1 of 18 NASA

Shuttle Enterprise

NASA often refers to its space shuttles as orbiters, but the very first of the shuttles never actually made it into orbit. Then again, it wasn't supposed to. In 1977, four years before the shuttle Columbia would become the first of the airplane-like spacecraft to leave the atmosphere (the anniversary is Monday), NASA conducted a series of ground and flight tests with a version called the Enterprise.

The shuttle Enterprise, officially designated OV-101, was commanded by former Apollo 13 astronaut Fred Haise (left), teamed with C. Gordon Fullerton, who served as pilot. (Two other NASA astronaut crew members, Joe Engle and Dick Truly, also got a chance at the helm.)

EnterpriseStarTrekCast.jpg
2 of 18 NASA

'Star Trek' cast

If the Enterprise name puts you in mind of a certain outer-space TV show, that's by design. Originally, the orbiter was to be called the Constitution--its final assembly occurred in 1976, the bicentennial year for the United States. But fans of the show "Star Trek" (at the time, there had been only the one, and no movies yet) mounted a write-in campaign to get the shuttle to carry the name of the show's famed starship. Thus, NASA's creation became the Enterprise.

This photo from the shuttle's rollout in September 1976, at Rockwell's Palmdale, Calif., assembly facility, is both a snapshot of the newly christened Enterprise and a time capsule of 1970s apparel. The group here includes both NASA officials and cast members from the original "Star Trek" series, pictured from left to right: James D. Fletcher, NASA administrator; DeForest Kelley (the TV show's Dr. McCoy); George Takei (Mr. Sulu); Nichelle Nichols (Lt. Uhura); Leonard Nimoy (Mr. Spock); Gene Rodenberry (the creator of "Star Trek"); an unidentified man; and Walter Koenig (Ensign Pavel Checkov). The bearded fellow behind Takei and Nichols would seem to be James Doohan (Scotty from the show), but the NASA site provides no identifying information.

EnterpriseSeparation.jpg
3 of 18 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (NASA-DFRC)

Shuttle separates from 747

Before the Enterprise could fly on its own, it first was mated to a Boeing 747 for ground and aerial tests at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base in California. The progression started with three taxi tests in February 1977, and then five flights in which the shuttle was inactive and unmanned. In June and July of that year, still captive to the 747, the shuttle was "active"--a crew on board operated the flight control systems, and did a dress rehearsal for the eventual free flight. Finally, in five flights between August and October, the shuttle was set free.
EnterpriseFreeFlight.jpg
4 of 18 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (NASA-DFRC)

Enterprise flies free

For the free flights, the Enterprise was released from its 747 carrier at altitudes of between 19,000 and 26,000 feet. It then proceeded to glide back to the ground--that's how all the shuttles would eventually return from orbit, in unpowered flight.
EnterpriseFreeFlight2.JPG
5 of 18 NASA

Free flight

The Enterprise flies over the Southern California desert. For the final two free flights, the tail cone--which had been used to minimize turbulence--was removed, since that would be the actual configuration on return from space. The final flight came to a close with a landing on the concrete runway at Edwards AFB, again simulating a return from an actual orbital mission; the landings for the previous four flights were on the Edwards dry lake bed.

NASA says that the fifth and final approach and landing test revealed a problem with the shuttle's flight control system that could have led to a dangerous situation called pilot-induced oscillation--a flaw corrected by further research.

EnterpriseTestStand.jpg
6 of 18 NASA

Marshall test stand

In March 1978, now at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama, the orbiter was joined for the first time with the other main elements of the shuttle lift-off system: the big external fuel tank and a pair of solid rocket boosters. The whole system was set into Marshall's dynamic test stand--with the shuttle's nose pointed skyward, as it would be for an actual launch--for ground vibration tests. (Here, the Enterprise is being hoisted into the test stand.)

Testing at Marshall continued until March 1979, after which the whole Enterprise lift-off rig was set up at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida for a checkout of the launch complex that would be used for the actual orbital flights, the first of which would come in April 1981 when the shuttle Columbia spent two days in space.

EnterpriseWindTunnel.jpg
7 of 18 NASA

Wind tunnel

This is not the Enterprise itself going through some strange time-space barrier. Rather, it's a model of the shuttle seen in a 1975 wind tunnel test meant to simulate ionized gases around the spacecraft during re-entry.
PrototypeLenticular.jpg
8 of 18 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (NASA-DFRC)

Lifting-body designs

Well before the shuttle Enterprise came along (assembly began in 1974), NASA researchers were already cooking up ideas for "lifting body" spacecraft that didn't look or work exactly like a tubular rocket. Throughout the 1960s and into the early 1970s, NASA worked through a series of lifting-body prototypes that it says were quite influential on the eventual shuttle program.

This artist's rendering from 1962 shows three such designs, from left to right: the M2-F1, the M1-L, and a lenticular shape. The wingless structure--the body of the vehicle itself provides the lift in the atmosphere--would allow for a horizontal re-entry, like the descent of an airplane, which in turn would mean less damage from the extreme heat of re-entry, according to the space agency. It was the M2-F1 design that would soon enough be flying.

PrototypeM2F1towed.jpg
9 of 18 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (NASA-DFRC)

M2-F1 behind C-47

The M2-F1 flies at the end of a tow rope behind a C-47 aircraft, probably sometime in 1964. During this series of tests, the C-47 would tow the prototype spacecraft to an altitude of 12,000 feet, and then release it to glide back to the Rogers Dry Lake bed at Edwards Air Force Base, California, in a descent that NASA says typically would take about two minutes, with speeds topping out at about 120 miles per hour.

Earlier flight tests had involved being towed from the ground by what NASA calls "a hopped-up Pontiac convertible." The space agency elaborates: "Walter 'Whitey' Whiteside, who was a retired Air Force maintenance officer working in the [Flight Research Center]'s Flight Operations Division, was a dirt-bike rider and hot-rodder. Together with Boyden 'Bud' Bearce in the Procurement and Supply Branch of the FRC, Whitey acquired a Pontiac Catalina convertible with the largest engine available. He took the car to Bill Straup's renowned hot-rod shop near Long Beach for modification. With a special gearbox and racing slicks, the Pontiac could tow the 1,000-pound M2-F1 110 miles per hour in 30 seconds."

Altogether, there were about 400 ground tows and 77 aircraft tows for the M2-F1.

PrototypeM2F1.jpg
10 of 18 NASA

M2-F1 with test pilot

"Lacking wings," says NASA, "the M2-F1 used an unusual configuration for its control surfaces. It had two rudders on the fins, two elevons (called 'elephant ears') mounted on the outsides of the fins, and two body flaps on the upper rear fuselage." (By the way, in the aircraft's designation, M is for "manned," and F for "flight").
PrototypeM2F2.JPG
11 of 18 NASA

M2-F2 with B-52

Next came the M2-F2 prototype. It's seen here attached to a "mothership" B-52 sometime in the latter half of 1966 or early 1967. The modified bomber (NASA B-52, Tail Number 008), which similarly had carried the X-15 rocket plane aloft for tests throughout the 1960s, would take the 22-foot-long, 4,600-pound M2-F2 to an altitude of about 45,000 feet for glide flight testing. (A later version, the M2-F3, added a third vertical fin at the rear for stability. Powered flights started with the M2-F3.)
Scotty.jpg
12 of 18 NASA

James Doohan meets pilot Bruce Peterson

We return to the "Star Trek" theme for a moment with this 1967 photo of actor James Doohan meeting NASA's Bruce Peterson, a test pilot and engineer, in front of the M2-F2. In May 1967, Peterson was injured in a crash during his fourth glide flight of the M2-F2 and its 16th overall, which was planned to be the last before the start of powered flights. NASA describes the incident at length:

"[A]s pilot Bruce Peterson neared the lake bed, the M2-F2 suffered a pilot-induced oscillation (PIO). The vehicle rolled from side to side in flight as he tried to bring it under control. Peterson recovered, but then observed a rescue helicopter that seemed to pose a collision threat. Distracted, Peterson drifted in a cross-wind to an unmarked area of the lake bed where it was very difficult to judge the height over the lake bed because of a lack of the guidance the markers provided on the lake bed runway.

"Peterson fired the landing rockets to provide additional lift, but he hit the lake bed before the landing gear was fully down and locked. The M2-F2 rolled over six times, coming to rest upside down. Pulled from the vehicle by Jay King and Joseph Huxman, Peterson was rushed to the base hospital, transferred to March Air Force Base and then the UCLA Hospital. He recovered but lost vision in his right eye due to a staph infection."

HL10lakebed.jpg
13 of 18 NASA

HL-10

A sister ship to the M2-F2 was the HL-10, parked here on Rogers Dry Lake bed. NASA says the HL-10 ("HL" for "horizontal landing") was the best of the original heavyweight lifting bodies. It flew 37 times during the research program. Like the M2-F2, it was built by Northrop.

"This 1968 photo shows the vehicle after the fins were modified to remove instabilities encountered on the first flight," says NASA. Driven by wind tunnel testing, according to the space agency, those modifications "involved a change to the shape of the leading edge of the fins to eliminate flow separation...NASA Flight Research Center (FRC) engineer Bob Kempel then plotted thousands of data points by hand to come up with the modification, which involved a fiberglass glove backed with a metal structure on each fin's leading edge."

HL10BillDana.jpg
14 of 18 NASA

Bill Dana and HL-10

NASA test pilot Bill Dana stands with the HL-10 in April 1969. About 10 months later, he took the HL-10 to an altitude of just over 90,000 feet, a record for the lifting-body program. (That was nine days after Air Force test pilot Peter Hoag took the spacecraft prototype to Mach 1.86, or 1,228 miles per hour.)
PrototypeX24B.JPG
15 of 18 NASA

X-24B

The last of the lifting-body research vehicles was the X-24, the A version of which first flew (unpowered) in 1969. The version seen in flight here is the X-24B, which hit a top speed of 1,164 mph and an altitude of 74,130 feet.
PrototypeX33.JPG
16 of 18 NASA

X-33

Jump ahead now to the mid- to late 1990s, more than a decade after the Columbia lifted off on the first orbital space shuttle mission, and NASA was looking into designs for reusable launch vehicles that could eventually replace the shuttle fleet. This artist's conception shows the X-33 Advanced Technology Demonstrator, offered up by Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works operations. It never got too far past the drawing board, and NASA withdrew funds for the X-33 in 2001.
PrototypeX38Hangar.jpg
17 of 18 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (NASA-DFRC)

X-38 in hangar

Another recent prototype was the X-38 Crew Return Vehicle design, which NASA says was intended to help develop a spacecraft that could serve as a "lifeboat" for the International Space Station, among other uses. In this 1998 photo, an X-38 sits in a hangar at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center. The project used off-the-shelf technology in order to keep costs down. For instance, NASA says, the flight computer in the X-38 was commercial equipment that was in use in aircraft at the time, and the flight software operating system also was a commercial system.

Clearly reflecting its lifting-body lineage, the X-38 prototype vehicle (several were made) was 28 feet long and 14 feet wide, and weighed approximately 16,000 pounds. The X-38 was built by Scaled Composites, which more recently has been involved in the SpaceShipOne and SpaceShipTwo projects that are at the forefront of the nascent commercial spaceflight industry.

PrototypeX38Pylon.jpg
18 of 18 NASA

X-38 on B-52 pylon

Flight testing of the X-38 prototypes in the late 1990s and through at least 2001 included captive carries attached to the wing of Dryden's B-52 008 (shown here), along with parachute and parafoil drop tests and free flights. The X-38 program, however, was canceled shortly after the turn of the century.

Since then, NASA has turned its attention to other projects. One, the Orion crew vehicle, apparently met its demise earlier this year when the federal government cut off funding for the Constellation project. Another, the X-37, is now being used for research by the U.S. Air Force, which plans to send the autonomous X-37B test vehicle into space later this month.

More Galleries

My Favorite Shots From the Galaxy S24 Ultra's Camera
A houseplant

My Favorite Shots From the Galaxy S24 Ultra's Camera

20 Photos
Honor's Magic V2 Foldable Is Lighter Than Samsung's Galaxy S24 Ultra
magic-v2-2024-foldable-1383

Honor's Magic V2 Foldable Is Lighter Than Samsung's Galaxy S24 Ultra

10 Photos
The Samsung Galaxy S24 and S24 Plus Looks Sweet in Aluminum
Samsung Galaxy S24

The Samsung Galaxy S24 and S24 Plus Looks Sweet in Aluminum

23 Photos
Samsung's Galaxy S24 Ultra Now Has a Titanium Design
The Galaxy S24 Ultra in multiple colors

Samsung's Galaxy S24 Ultra Now Has a Titanium Design

23 Photos
I Took 600+ Photos With the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max. Look at My Favorites
img-0368.jpg

I Took 600+ Photos With the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max. Look at My Favorites

34 Photos
17 Hidden iOS 17 Features You Should Definitely Know About
Invitation for the Apple September iPhone 15 event

17 Hidden iOS 17 Features You Should Definitely Know About

18 Photos
AI or Not AI: Can You Spot the Real Photos?
img-1599-2.jpg

AI or Not AI: Can You Spot the Real Photos?

17 Photos