Would you buy a 'cheaper' iPhone? (Poll)

Rumor has it we'll see a low-cost iPhone as early as this summer. But let's get real: it's not the price of the phone itself that's a problem.

As CNET's David Carnoy reported earlier today, the Wall Street Journal is stoking the rumor-mill fire with news that a smaller, cheaper iPhone could ship as soon as this summer .

My take: so what? Sure, I'd love to see an iPhone that's thinner and lighter than the iPhone 4--but let's not fool ourselves into believing it's going to be cheap.

See, much as I'm a fan of discount tech, the price of the iPhone isn't what bugs me. It's a sweet, sophisticated piece of hardware, well worth a couple hundred bucks.

No, the problem isn't the price of the hardware: it's the price of the service. AT&T and Verizon charge around $70 per month minimum for a required two years of service. That means the phone will end up costing you $1,680 at the very least.

So let's say the iPhone Mini, iPhone Nano, or whatever it ends up being called is priced at $99. Or $49. Or even $0. Assuming the service plans remain the same (and there's no indication they're going to change), you're saving only a couple hundred bucks, max.

I like saving a couple hundred bucks as much as anybody (probably more, in fact). I just think it's a mistake to hype a "cheaper" iPhone that's really not.

What do you think? Would a sub-$100 price tag make a difference in your purchase plans? Or do you agree that we need cheaper service, not cheaper hardware? Vote in our poll, then share your thoughts in the comments.


Join the discussion

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Show Comments Hide Comments
Latest Galleries from CNET
Tech industry's high-flying 2014
Uber's tumultuous ups and downs in 2014 (pictures)
The best and worst quotes of 2014 (pictures)
A roomy range from LG (pictures)
This plain GE range has all of the essentials (pictures)
Sony's 'Interview' heard 'round the world (pictures)