Will open-source Facebook accomplish anything?

Open source is not going to save Facebook from itself. It might make it a more relevant development platform, but it's not going to resolve Facebook's core business problem, which is that today it offers precious little business value, by which I

The rumor mill is swirling that Facebook is set to announce the open sourcing of its application platform . While presumably a response to Google-led OpenSocial, the larger question is whether it will matter.

Open source is very good at some things, and not so good at others. For example, if Facebook wants to open source its application platform to make it easier to create and integrate applications into the Facebook platform, open source is good at that. Just look at Mozilla's Firefox or Drupal.

But is this Facebook's biggest problem? Ben Lorica hints at a bigger underlying problem that no code license can solve:

Actually, the more probable scenario is that (closed) social networks become less important over the long term. With more web applications incorporating social features, users will gradually "leave" closed social networks altogether. Already, I know less and less people who use Facebook regularly. Most people I know log in only when they receive a "friend" request - sadly hugs, gifts, zombies and pokes are losing their allure.

The primary problem with Facebook is not applications. The primary problem with Facebook is utility. When was the last time that Facebook enabled much of anything useful in your life?

It does happen, but not as often as it should. Dave Rosenberg and I spent some time the other day looking up old friends. I found someone from my fourth grade class in Virginia on Facebook on Friday. I had no idea what to do with that information, but there it was.

I use LinkedIn for recruiting. It provides tangible business value that I can expense. I've tried to use Facebook but it's such a bundle of obnoxious noise that I have no idea what to do with it. I've said before that Facebook's biggest opportunity is to enable real communication between real friends , and then monetize it, but it's going to have to abandon its "friendly" promiscuity first.

Open source is not going to save Facebook from itself. It may well turn the social networking space into a "race to openness," as Glyn suggests. This will be good.

It might make Facebook a more relevant development platform, but it's not going to resolve Facebook's core business problem, which is that today it offers precious little business value, by which I mean that its consumer data/interactions are too dirty and too random to yield substantive value that advertisers and others will pay to access.

Tags:
Tech Culture
About the author

    Matt Asay is chief operating officer at Canonical, the company behind the Ubuntu Linux operating system. Prior to Canonical, Matt was general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, an open-source applications company. Matt brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.

     

    Join the discussion

    Conversation powered by Livefyre

    Don't Miss
    Hot Products
    Trending on CNET

    HOT ON CNET

    iPhone running slow?

    Here are some quick fixes for some of the most common problem in iOS 7.