Why TechCrunch lives, and Valleywag dies
Valleywag is dead, and none too soon. It's a good example of journalism gone tabloid.
Valleywag is dead (or, at least, diminished), "news" about the sex trade in Silicon Valley, trying to foment controversy around Peter Thiel's personal life, and so on.. About time. I used to like Valleywag, but then it started trying to drive page views by breaking
When it broke news, even scandalous news, it was good. When it didn't, well, it wasn't.
Contrast that with TechCrunch. TechCrunch routinely breaks real news. It covers startups that matter (and many that don't). It has become an hourly read for me, as it offers content that I don't easily find elsewhere.
Is it unique in this? No. CNET breaks a lot of technology news and has done some interesting work with blogs (pats himself on the back), plus it remains a must-visit product reviews site. Nobody does general business news better than The Wall Street Journal. The Register? It provides a great deal of exceptional content with a fantastic, biting tone.
Valleywag? Increasing snide, decreasing substance. Owen Thomas did much better work while he was at Business 2.0. I like his writing. I just think he had to pander to the wrong elements at Valleywag. Hopefully we'll get the best of Valleywag (and Thomas) as it's folded into Gawker.