Why I ditched the Galaxy Gear for the Fitbit Force

My wrist has only so much room, and the Fitbit Force has won the shoving match against the mighty Galaxy Gear.

Fitbit Force
Sarah Tew/CNET

I've had a love affair with high-tech watches for as long as I can remember. I still recall with fondness my beloved Casio Marlin W-300, which I cherished as a tot. I've also proudly worn some truly laughable devices out in public, much to my friends' annoyance and eventual entertainment. Remember the Pimp series from Tokyo Flash? On second thought, perhaps it's better that you don't.

That's why I was beside myself with shock when I decided to put down the robust Samsung Galaxy Gear smartwatch in favor of Fitbit's new Force fitness tracker . I know it's no true smartwatch, but the Force efficiently doubles as both powerful health device and futuristic timepiece.

I had high hopes for Sony's first smartwatch. Sarah Tew/CNET

My freaky wrist gear fetish
When Samsung officially gave birth to the Galaxy Gear I practically vibrated with excitement and anticipation. And when the company was kind enough to drop one of its latest gizmos into my eager hands, along with the excellent Note 3 , I was overjoyed. I should have known better, though. My history with the nascent smartwatch product category (wrist-borne devices that tell time and talk to smartphones) has been a rocky one.

Both the Motorola Motoactv and Sony Smartwatch had lots of potential but didn't quite deliver, whether in terms of design, functionality, or runtime. That said, they came a heck of a lot closer to being devices I'd actually use regularly than other clunkers I've seen. I mean the Metawatch and I'm Watch are particularly flaming trainwrecks (sorry guys, nothing personal) I wouldn't inflict on my despised enemies.

The Galaxy Gear's sweet hardware is undone by software limitations. Andrew Hoyle/CNET

Power and style without purpose
The Galaxy Gear, however, is another story entirely, which makes it all the more tragic a tale to tell. It's practically a microcomputer attached to your arm. Running a modified version of Android driven by an 800MHz processor and 512MB of RAM, it has the chops to run full Android apps. The Gear is a well-crafted hunk of mobile hardware, too, with a bright OLED screen and metal construction.

Sadly, despite its power, the Gear fails utterly at what a general-purpose smartwatch is supposed to do. That primary task being to screen all your digital communication so you touch your phone less. With no way to see at a glance the contents of e-mail and social-media alerts, arguably the bulk of what most people grab their handsets for in the first place, the Gear essentially becomes a geeky and expensive $300 conversation piece.

The watch's 24-hour battery life, while longer than say the Sony Smartwatch's running time of 6 to 8 hours, still means you'll need to charge it every day or so. Lastly, the fact that the Gear works with just one phone, the Note 3 , is the final straw. Frankly I find the whole Gear situation a sad state of affairs, because I really wanted to like this device and I still believe it has tons of potential.

The Fitbit Force's combo of fitness tracking and watch capabilities are compelling. Sarah Tew/CNET

A force I can't resist
Now enter the Fitbit Force , which for $129.95 is sleek, small, light, and functional as an advanced pedometer and fitness tracker. It also can log your sleep, sync via Bluetooth with iPhones and select Samsung handsets, and connect users to the vast analytical tools Fitbit has built online.

Next throw in its bright OLED screen, which displays the time and allows the Force to function as a watch, and you begin to see its strong appeal. The Force is water-resistant, too, so jumping into the shower with it or wearing the gizmo in a tropical downpour won't give you extra stress. I also prefer committing to something that can run for 7 to 10 days as opposed to the Gear's short 24-hour battery life. The Force's promised caller notifications (on iOS only) are icing on the cake. Let's hope these capabilities will extend to Android phones once KitKat comes calling.

Of course this doesn't mean that I won't be tempted to grab the Galaxy Gear and strap it on in the future. Far from it. If Samsung, or more likely the clever hacking community, bestows on the Gear the gift of universal Android support (regardless of phone maker) and support for real notifications (from your app of choice), well, count me back in.

Read the full CNET Review

Fitbit Force

The Bottom Line: The Fitbit Force leaps to the top of the fitness tracker heap, with a bright screen, comfortable fit, and a bevy of slick features. / Read full review

Read the full CNET Review

Samsung Galaxy Gear Smartwatch

The Bottom Line: Samsung's take on the smartwatch has some potential, and it does get some things right, but its inability to perform truly "smart" functions means it falls far short of expectations. / Read full review

About the author

Brian Bennett is senior editor for mobile phones at CNET and reviews a wide range of mobile communication products. These include smartphones and their myriad accessories. He has more than 12 years of experience in technology journalism and has put practically anything fun with a micro chip through its paces at some point.

 

ARTICLE DISCUSSION

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Don't Miss
Hot Products
Trending on CNET

Hot on CNET

CNET's giving away a 3D printer

Enter for a chance to win* the MakerBot Replicator 3D Printer and all the supplies you need to get started.