X

U.K. law mashes spam

It will soon be an offense for a British company to send unsolicited junk mail to personal e-mail accounts--but not to a business address.

Graeme Wearden Special to CNET News.com
3 min read
The British government introduced legislation on Thursday that aims to protect Internet and mobile phone users from unsolicited commercial e-mail.

The new law, which is Britain's implementation of the EU Privacy and Electronics Communication Directive, comes into force on Dec. 11. The law makes it an offense for a U.K. company to send junk e-mail or text messages, unless the recipient is an existing customer or has given their permission to receive such material. Companies that flout the law could face a fine of roughly $8,136 (5,000 British pounds) for each breach.

However, the measure only covers personal e-mail. It will still be legal for a company to send unsolicited commercial messages to corporate e-mail addresses.

According to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), this decision was taken so that "legitimate business-to-business communication" was not hampered. This may be little consolation to U.K. workers who find their inboxes full of ads for Viagra, debt-relief plans and pills for "physical enhancement," but the DTI insists that during its recent consultation on the EU directive, many businesses said they didn't want to lose e-mail as a marketing tool.

E-commerce minister Stephen Timms believes that the legislation is an important step in combating the growth of spam, which is now thought to make up at least half of all e-mail received in Britain. "I think this is a pretty effective method for addressing intra-EU spam," Timms told a group of journalists on Wednesday. He added, however, that the new legislation wouldn't be enough on its own to stop the problem.

Timms explained that it was also important to educate people on how to cut down the amount of spam they receive, and to take an international approach to the issue.

This last point carries considerable weight, as there is concern that the United States is taking the wrong approach to spam regulation. Though the EU directive has pushed for an opt-in system, America looks to be on course to introduce legislation that would put the onus on individuals to opt-out of receiving unsolicited e-mail from companies.

Experts have warned that this could lead to the meltdown of the Internet as a communications medium because it would effectively legitimize spamming.

Timms did not criticize the U.S. approach to spam, and said he was encouraged that moves were being taken to address the problem.

"I hope we can have a good dialogue about how we can take action that is effective for both of us. We've got a lot to talk about," Timms told ZDNet UK.

With so much spam coming from outside of Europe, there have been claims that the European directive--and the U.K.'s implementation of it through this new legislation--will only have limited impact.

The new laws will also cover cookies, which are small files that are placed on a PC's hard drive by a Web site to help it to identify the user. Web sites will now have to clearly identify when they operate a cookie, and will have to allow PC users to switch them off.

Graeme Wearden of ZDNet UK reported from London.