Gartner has had a rocky relationship with open source in the past, butsuggests that its views on open source have evolved. It's therefore time for the open-source world's views on Gartner to evolve, too.
Gartner hasn't historically been much of a friend to open source. While Forrester, Redmonk, the 451 Group, IDC, and other analyst firms long ago began recording the rise of open source within enterprise computing, Gartner seemed to side with the proprietary vendors in.
I made similar accusations myself.
Gartner responded to such attacks, defending the integrity of its research. Yet its blind spot to open source seemed to persist.
Not anymore. Whatever the reason for the erstwhile overlooking of open source, Gartner analysts' current views on open source have changed, in some cases dramatically.
It used to be that open-source companies and projects never made it into Gartner's Magic Quadrant (MQ), which have tremendous power for, if somewhat limited utility to, enterprise buyers.
Now, you'll find that Gartner lists Drupal ("Drupal is in the Visionaries quadrant because of its use of the open source model to drive adoption and popularity, while providing enterprise services via organizations such as Acquia"), Liferay, and MindTouch in its newest "Social Software in the Workplace" MQ, while Alfresco, MySQL, JasperSoft, Pentaho, and others are listed in a variety of other MQs. (Disclosure: I work for Alfresco and am an adviser to MindTouch and JasperSoft.)
Gartner also recognizes theand how .
This isn't to suggest that Gartner finally "gets it" because it's writing favorably about open source. In fact, some of Gartner's best, most interesting analysis is available for free on the blogs section of its Web site, about open source.
It is, however, balanced and often quite insightful, particularly the work of Gartner analyst Brian Prentice.
Given all this, it's time for open sorcerers to stop using Gartner as a straw man for poor analysis on open source. This isn't helpful and, increasingly, it's not remotely accurate.