With the Microsoft/Yahoo/Google triangle taking a new shape as Microsoft exited and Yahoo and Google connected, the analysts covering tech industry sports are weighing in with their opinions.
Some Kara Swisher reports that Microsoft is done with its courtship of Yahoo and nothing will bring them back to the negotiating table.if the company can't get back on track or Carl Icahn wins his proxy fight to control the Yahoo board. That may be wishful thinking.
Mike Arrington of TechCrunch called the Yahoo-Google deal a massive destruction of shareholder value, employee morale, and the Interent balance of power:
Yahoo's hatred of Microsoft runs so deep that they were actually, in the end, willing to destroy the future of their company just to keep it independent for a short while longer. They've ignored the wishes of their shareholders, employees and many now former key employees in killing that deal. And apart from Google, CEO Jerry Yang, President Sue Decker and possibly Tim O'Reilly, I don't believe there is anyone in the world that is happy with what has happened.
In a further lambasting post, Arrington called Yahoo desperate and possibly neurotic:
Quite simply, it looks to me like Yahoo is effectively paying Google off to step in and (1) keep Jerry Yang, Sue Decker and the current board of directors in power, and (2) avoid a desperation deal with Microsoft for as long as possible, or longer. It's not even clear to me that Google wants this deal, based on the terms. It almost looks like they're just doing Yahoo a favor, and trying to keep them out of Microsoft's hands.
At the other end of the spectrum, venture capitalist Fred Wilson thinks that Yahoo did the right thing by choosing Google over Microsoft as a partner.
Yahoo! finally woke up and did what they should have done years ago, cede search monetization to Google who simply does it better and will always do this era of search better than anyone else.
Now Yahoo! will do what it needs to do. Clean house, get lean, get out of businesses it shouldn't be in. Focus on what it's good at. And start making money and growing again.
They may need new leadership to do that. But selling this asset to Microsoft just because they had the wrong leadership and probably still have the wrong leadership is a mistake.
From my reading of the events over the last five months, Yang regrets that Microsoft walked away from the acquisition talks. "We all felt and understood a combination done right has a tremendous amount of power and leverage," Yang said during an.
As a founder, Yang preferred that Yahoo stay independent and that he have the chance to turn the company around as CEO. Microsoft historically was not the kind of partner that Yang considered for a marriage. And his board of directors, led by non-executive Chairman Roy Bostock, seemed to go along with that line of thought.
But the entire affair turned out to be mostly about the money, as Decker admitted. "We never got through the price door," she stated during the same D6 interview. Yahoo's board believed that the company was worth more than $35 per share based on future promise, and Microsoft wasn't on the same page. In effect, Microsoft called Yahoo's bluff.
It also wasn't helpful that Yahoo was negotiating the search deal with Google at the same time Microsoft was pursuing its hostile bid. After months of rejection, Microsoft basically became less enchanted with the potential marriage, and despite the pummeling from the shareholders, Carl Icahn's camp, and the press, Yang and his advisors held out for more money.
Unable to come to terms with, Yahoo took the less complicated, that allowed the company to remain in the search game.
As I wrote in my post "," Jerry Yang and Sue Decker have a short runway--about six months--to prove that they can "redefine" the essence of Yahoo in a way that yields more revenue, profit, and positive buzz. With the continuing board room distractions, employee defections, and morale issues that go along with being under siege by various parties, the duo have their work cut out for them.