Stephen Wilde, of Hampshire, England-based company Really Useful Domains, told ZDNet UK that it was an "idealistic approach" to suggest that stockpiling was unethical.
The accusation came from Andrew Hooper, a new father who recently wanted to take advantage of the new .eu top-level domain to give his 2-week-old son, Christopher James, a "domain that he can use during his life."
Hooper was dismayed to find that cjh.eu was one of hundreds of domains that had been bought by Really Useful Domains, only to be resold for a minimum of $1,933 each.
Registering for domains to resell them, a practice known as warehousing, is illegal for registrars themselves; doing so would be a breach of their contracts with Eurid, short for European Registry of Internet Domain Names. Eurid, the organization set up to administer the, last month launched a lawsuit against .
As Wilde and his company registered all the names through a Canadian third party, no rules were broken. However, Hooper maintained that registrars had the market "sewn up."
"You have to go through a registrar, and they're monopolizing the market. Eurid has...allowed anyone who puts down a 10,000 euro ($12,889.39) deposit to have a share of this monopoly," Hooper said.
"There are no decent investigations into these companies--they don't seem to be enforcing the spirit of the law, let alone the letter of it," he added.
But Wilde argued that registrars had only "really had an advantage over the public" during the initial land rush for .eu domain names, which took place earlier this year. "Now it makes no difference at all whether you're a registrar or not," he said Wednesday.
He insisted that Really Useful Domains had not even been an accredited registrar during the land rush, and he played down the suggestion that people should not be able to stockpile names for resale at inflated prices.
"I think it's a very idealistic approach and, if you could guarantee every human on the planet would adhere to that, it would be fine, but (you can't)," he said. "I'm afraid if they didn't put enough rules in to enforce it, you only need one person on the globe to...not adhere to that, and we'd all wring our hands."
Wilde pointed out that thousands of Europeans had children who bore the same initials. "On a mathematical basis...you have probably about 20,000 people entitled to that domain for their child--which one do you give it to? (Eurid) tried to start the playing field fairly, but after that, it's not my job to say, 'You're more entitled to this,' or 'you are.'"
He also claimed that he had been unable to acquire the three-letter domain for his own son and had even tried to "buy a car registration for him, but it was 25,000 pounds ($47,726.87)," adding: "I would like it, but someone else has it. That's market forces."
Eurid itself seems to agree with this standpoint. "It should be possible for anyone to register domain names, and as many as they like," representative Patrik Linden said Wednesday. "If they find someone to pass the domain name to, there's nothing we can do...We're not particularly fond of this, but it is allowed."
In the lawsuit filed against hundreds of U.S. registrars, Eurid accused them of conspiring to set up three front companies in the United Kingdom and then registering tens of thousands of .eu domains in those companies' names, thus attempting to bypass Eurid's rules on registrars stockpiling names for their own benefit.
That case and other complaints over allocations during the land rush phase led British Parliament member Diana Wallis to file a parliamentary question on the subject for the European Commission. A response was due Wednesday but has not appeared at the time of writing, probably due to the current parliamentary recess.
A Commission representative said that as Eurid is "an independent agency, (it) does not have any supervisory role," though there is a "set of rules under which Eurid has to operate, and we have to ensure this framework is observed."
David Meyer of ZDNet UK reported from London.