The Electronic Privacy Information Center Friday asked Congress to begin a series of oversight hearings on whether the National Security Agency'swas legal.
A letter (PDF) from the group says a secret court "went beyond its legal authority when it sanctioned a program of domestic surveillance unrelated to the collection of foreign intelligence."
The disclosure of the court order, which The Guardian newspaper did late Wednesday, has roiled Washington, D.C. officialdom -- but most of the debate has centered on the political fallout, not whether the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order was legal or not. A series of congressional hearings could shift the debate to whether the Justice Department and the court's judges complied with the law or not.
How concerned are you about the NSA snooping on your Web activities?
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat who heads the intelligence committee, confirmed Thursday the Verizon phone surveillance had been in place for at least six years. A subsequent Wall Street Journal report disclosed that AT&T and Sprint also had their records vacuumed up by the NSA.
FISC Judge Roger Vinson, who normally serves as a federal judge in Florida, signed the order in April. It requires Verizon to hand over to the NSA "on an ongoing daily basis" information about all domestic and overseas calls -- "including local telephone calls" but not the call content.
Vinson's order relies on Section 215 of the Patriot Act, 50 USC 1861, better known as the "business records" portion. That section of the law allows FBI agents to obtain any "tangible thing," including "books, records, papers, documents, and other items," a broad term that includes dumps from private-sector computer databases with limited judicial oversight.