Oracle users go ga-ga for open source, including MySQL

Until Oracle, IBM, and other proprietary database vendors figure out how to work with open source, they'll continue to encourage fissures in the foundations of their revenue models. It will take time, but open source is clearly a threat.

It's great to be king (aka "Oracle"), but apparently the peasants are secretly in revolt. According to a survey of the Independent Oracle Users Group (IOUG) [PDF], open source adoption is rampant within the rank-and-file of Oracle users...including widespread adoption of MySQL.

Uptake is still small, but the cracks in the part iron, part clay feet are starting to spread:

There was an increase in the number of organizations reporting that they are running over half of their applications on open source software, increasing from 9 percent in 2006 to 13 percent in the 2007 report. Currently, more than one-third of the respondents report that they have deployed an open source database in production, with nearly three-quarters of that group having MySQL installed. Interestingly, the availability of "Express Edition" databases from Oracle, Microsoft and IBM has not slowed the adoption of open source databases - at sites with an "Express Edition" installed 56 percent also reported MySQL installed and 22 percent reported PostgreSQL.

While open source is prevalent at many levels in the enterprise, the study found its adoption does not run deeply, yet. Currently, fewer than 10 percent of enterprise application portfolios are supported or interact with open source systems. At the same time, 52 percent of all organizations plan to increase their adoption of open source software in the coming year, a pattern that is consistent across both large and small organizations. Organizations are attracted by the low cost of open source software with over two thirds reporting cost savings as the top reason for open source implementations, up from 57 percent in last year's open source study. [Emphasis mine.]

Of course such lame Express Editions can't stop MySQL, PostgreSQL, and other open-source databases. Why? Because they only tackle one (albeit a prominent) factor in open-source database adoption: cost. I've written about this before:

My prediction [on Oracle's Express Edition]? This move will be completely forgotten. Few to nobody will use it. And, 6-12 months from now, Oracle will have to give a real response to the open source threat it faces. Tossing a lightweight database in front of a fast-moving market that wants free, open, and killer databases just won't fly.

Crippled software is not the answer to open source. Open source is .

Until Oracle, IBM, and other proprietary database vendors figure this out, they'll continue to encourage fissures in the foundations of their revenue models. It will take time, but open source is clearly a threat.

Via Zack Urlocker.

Tech Culture
About the author

    Matt Asay is chief operating officer at Canonical, the company behind the Ubuntu Linux operating system. Prior to Canonical, Matt was general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, an open-source applications company. Matt brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.


    Join the discussion

    Conversation powered by Livefyre

    Show Comments Hide Comments
    Latest Galleries from CNET
    Trivia Crack is as fun and addictive as the name implies
    Make room for the Instant Pot Smart (pictures)
    New Subaru Outback puffs up, luxes up (pictures)
    Tales from a Tim3 Machin3-powered test kitchen (pictures)
    SkyMall's legacy of crazy geeky products (pictures)
    Best iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus cases