Making sense of a VMware acquisition of Red Hat

VMware is rumored to be interested in buying Red Hat, but it doesn't make sense.

OStatic raises an interesting question around the swirling rumors of VMware's interest in acquiring Red Hat: would an acquisition make sense?

OStatic's Sam Dean suggests the answer is a qualified yes, but I can't see it. He points to commoditization of virtualization at the hands of the operating system vendors as a key reason VMware would seek safety in Red Hat, but I would think this trend cuts the other way. Red Hat (and Novell) likely see virtualization's commoditization as a reason to push the knife deeper into VMware. Being acquired by an important but commoditized feature of their operating systems doesn't sound appealing to me...

Instead, I'd see more promise in VMware "moving up the stack" in the same way that infrastructure vendors have always done to evade commoditization. It's the strategy that Oracle has been following, along with Red Hat, IBM, and others.

Are there particular applications that lend themselves well to virtualization? If so, that's where I'd be looking for VMware's next acquisition. Or maybe a platform-as-a-service vendor to help create virtualized applications?

Or perhaps a much easier to use/deploy mechanism for applications? ThinApp promises to be such, but my own experience with rolling a VMware appliance is that it's not a particularly easy process.

I'm clearly grasping at straws here, but I don't think VMware needs to buy an operating system. Any thoughts on what VMware should be doing with its still-sizable bank account?

Featured Video
6
This content is rated TV-MA, and is for viewers 18 years or older. Are you of age?
Sorry, you are not old enough to view this content.

New Google OnHub router is one of a kind

Reviewing the search giant's sleek and super-cool OnHub home router (while totally and completely trusting Google with personal info).

by Dong Ngo