Linus Torvalds wakes up on the wrong side of the bed

Linus Torvalds is in a bit of a rage as to the politics of GPLv3, and writes accordingly.

Linus is in a dither about apparent Free Software Foundation politics that remain in GPLv3:

You claim that I "misunderstood" the"spirit of the GPL".

Dammit, the GPL is a license....

The beauty of the GPLv2 is exactly that it's a "tit-for-tat" license, and you can use it without having to drink the kool-aid.

I've said that over and over again. It's the "spirit of the GPLv2". It's what has made it such a great license, that lots of people (and companies) can use, is very fundamentally that it's fair....

I'm damn fed up with the FSF being the "protector of freedoms", and also feeling that they can define what those freedoms mean.

I agree with Linus that the GPL has been effective precisely because it doesn't require licensees to buy into the politics and religion allegedly behind open source. They simply have to abide by the terms of the license.

Now, importantly, to truly buy into those terms it's often necessary to at least have some of the same leanings (political or otherwise) as the FSF, but the license doesn't require this. It only requires compliance-in-action, not compliance-in-philosophy. This is why I continue to believe that Microsoft should be the GPL's biggest adherent - it actually fits well with how the company would prefer to do business.

Featured Video

Why do so many of us still buy cars with off-road abilities?

Cities are full of cars like the Subaru XV that can drive off-road but will never see any challenging terrain. What drives us to buy cars with these abilities when we don't really need them most of the time?

by Drew Stearne