ISPs to filter for copyrighted content? Why not just meter it?

ISPs to filter for copyrighted content? Why not just meter it?

ISPs are talking about getting into the copyright-enforcement business. It's hard to see where this will end, once it gets going. Privacy advocates are not going to like it, nor should they.

But I wonder if the effort misses the point, anyway. The end goal is for copyright holders to get paid, right? So why not just levy a "tax" (or subscription, if you will) on all broadband users at $5.99/month (or whatever the price should be). Make it mandatory unless someone agrees to have their bandwidth filtered for copyrighted content (unless bought through iTunes or other legitimate means). Then distribute that revenue between the various copyright holders in the entertainment industry.

Sound familiar? It should. This is not too dissimilar from what the music industry already does with ASCAP.

This model would have the benefit of encouraging a multitude of means of discovering, downloading, and trying new content...with the copyright holders getting paid in the process. What is there to lose?

Featured Video

Why do so many of us still buy cars with off-road abilities?

Cities are full of cars like the Subaru XV that can drive off-road but will never see any challenging terrain. What drives us to buy cars with these abilities when we don't really need them most of the time?

by Drew Stearne