Is this what's meant by "Think different."

A judge says Web sites can be forced to divulge sources, part of Apple's war against bloggers.

AppleÂ’s an infuriating company for me. I love its technology but I hate its politics. To wit, the legal offensive to force three online news sites to divulge the identities of sources that leaked information about upcoming Apple products.

The company’s argument is that bloggers or the sundry hole-in-the-wall online gossip sites do not deserve the same free speech protections as “legitimate members of the press.” In a preliminary ruling issued Thursday, the presiding judge went Apple’s way. I wouldn’t pay too much attention to the more apocalyptic predictions – at least not just yet. The outcome of this case has implications far beyond this minor tiff. Before it's resolved, the case may need to go all the way to the Supreme Court.

But why Apple insists on acting like a collection of petulant yuppies is another matter. Other tech companies deal with leaks all the time. Nobody’s happy when their discussions wind up as fodder for the rumor mill. But why turn this into a federal case –literally? So much for thinking differently.

Tags:
Tech Culture
About the author

Charles Cooper was an executive editor at CNET News. He has covered technology and business for more than 25 years, working at CBSNews.com, the Associated Press, Computer & Software News, Computer Shopper, PC Week, and ZDNet.

 

Join the discussion

Conversation powered by Livefyre

Show Comments Hide Comments
Latest Galleries from CNET
Tech industry's high-flying 2014
Uber's tumultuous ups and downs in 2014 (pictures)
The best and worst quotes of 2014 (pictures)
A roomy range from LG (pictures)
This plain GE range has all of the essentials (pictures)
Sony's 'Interview' heard 'round the world (pictures)