People generally seem to be reacting in three ways: in favor of the change, opposed, or they are simply unwilling to believe its true until hearing it directly from Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs. He's expected to make the announcement at the company's Worldwide Developer Conference Monday in San Francisco.
Some, like News.com reader Sam Kass, are "psyched" about the news and see it as Apple playing catch-up from a performance standpoint, "while still being top-notch at (human-computer interaction)."
"Down the road (Apple) has the potential to take the industry by storm," he said.
Bob Zhu, who is both an Apple and PC user, also thinks it's a good move and questions IBM's commitment on Mac CPU development.
?Switching to Intel doesn't guarantee Apple to have more powerful machines in future than if they stick with IBM," the News.com reader wrote. "But the move will give Apple a level playground with all other PC makers."
In contrast, another News.com reader, John Bresnahan, is very upset about the news. "I will never buy Apple again, ever. If this is true, I am very sad," he wrote. "How will I get new software for my computer?"
An AppleInsider member was one of many to suggest that the switchover to Intel is likely just for its WiMax chips.
"I don't think Apple and IBM are parting ways as reported," the member wrote. "The WiMax theory fits the overall picture better."
Others found the Apple-IBM divorce news curious, given that Microsoft recently dropped Intel for its Xbox 360.
"Now Apple might be doing the opposite. Are the two events in any way connected?" a AppleInsider member wondered.
Some just pooh-poohed the news, calling it stock market manipulation or a fake story leaked by Apple to catch a spy, as a Mac Observer member suggested.